I think it would be like Sovereigns in WoM. When they get defeated, they get sent to the nearest of your faction's towns, and they are fixed to that town (ie. can't move out of it) for that number of turns. Maybe in FE if a champion (but not a Sovereign, since they are inherently special) gets defeated again while still recovering from the first defeat, they automatically die?
StevenRLynchAbundanceThatIAM
Oh well, you can't have it all.
Do any of you play the Dominion mode?
Yeah, those cables can pass out some of the time. Good on you for finding a solution! =)
Or Linux! =)
Well, I think it was put in partly for the AI, so they didn't get all their champions targeted and wiped out pronto, and also to prevent running out of champions. But AFAIK, champions can still be killed, before they are recruited, by the opposite side (Kingdoms/Empires). However I understand what you're saying. Maybe there could be an option for custom maps/campaigns, if new champion spawning is possible (so they don't run out), for champions to die permanently?
I think the new Stardock service would be only programs made by Stardock or published by Stardock. I think they're trying to avoid being a big DD player this time round.
I too would vote for maps in the base game to either treasure quest items, resource sites or to an area you haven't discovered yet. With the apparent lethality of the FE landscape, as you say Cruxador scouting info could prove to be *more* valuable than a one off stat-boosting item.
That's alright. I wanted to get that initial post covered as soon as I could, as it was a WA campaign that was not necessarily being done at a national level, and it only had a short window to get people to participate. I don't mind what it leads to, as long as it is (mostly) respectful. ;-)
I second this idea.
Is the amount of mana lost something like 10% of your total for each champion that has to retreat? I know in WoM that when Sovereigns retreated they lost half their total mana. I think 10% of total mana lost for each champion lost in a single battle would be a good amount. If you lost 1 champion in one battle and then lost another champion in another battle, you would lose 10% of the mana you had at that time. But if you lost 2 champions in one battle and then 1 champi
[quote who="Alstein" reply="5" id="3036692"]I like this, though I think you should be able to regenerate parts/grow new parts with high lvl life/death magic. [/quote] I second this.
Nooooooooooo...! =)
I agree.
I use a mobile phone (I got the mobile phone about the same time my two watches died). However maybe I shouldn't given that they like spying on mobile phone stuff? :P
Yes, I'm interested about this too.
Yes.
[quote who="tazgecko" reply="11" id="3035138"]I'm still mad at Commodore for destroying my beloved Amiga.[/quote] Oh the Amiga. It was so far ahead of PCs and their operating systems, and their games were far superior, it took ages for Nintendo and then PCs to catch up. But the Amiga cards weren't played right and it died a slow death and eventually got overtaken.
No, you misunderstand me, I thought it was a fantastic invention. =)
Yes, I saw the offer on the forums too. (In fact, I saw it after buying Object Desktop from the email, so I would have seen it even if the email didn't get through.) If you don't check the forums very much, don't use social media and your email takes a long time to get there, that can be a problem in finding out about good deals. But if you do even one of them (or your email doesn't take too long to get there), you have a much higher chance of finding out abo
If it is an error with the Stardock mail service, then I think the special offer should be opened up for one more day and a sticky made for all forums so that people who received the email late can buy the special offer. I know that will allow those who received the email earlier one more chance, but there's not much that really can be done about that. I bought the Object Desktop subscription, but only because I was one of the lucky ones who received the email at the correct t
I use gmail too, and I got the email at the correct time.
Yes. I just wonder whether my Samsung was one that had the carrier installation on it. It just goes to show, where there's a way to mine information, even if it is illegal and highly unethical, many companies will go for it surreptitiously. Btw: by carrier, do you mean the mobile phone makers, or the telecommunications companies that run the networks?
Hmm, so even Samsung could be affected. I have a Samsung from about 2 years ago. This is a serious breach of trust, privacy, ethics and in a lot of cases, the law. May they (CarrierIQ and all the Carriers involved) get what they deserve.