Heavenfall

Heavenfall

Joined Member # 3239800
337 Posts 8,867 Replies 34,020 Reputation

You need to define the internalname first Greenskin Crest filenamegoeshere.png then you can put that internalname in the preferredlogotype.

1 Replies 2,281 Views
Reply to Spacebase DF9 in PC Gaming

Both rimworld and spacebase df9 are very early alpha, they are not really good purchases right now in my opinion. Spacebase you can only get a few (2-4) hours of gameplay out of, Rimworld has different randomizations which basically make the games different so it lasts a bit longer. But unlike spacebase, in rimworld you are constantly reminded of how a lot (most) of the content isn't in the game yet. Spacebase, at least, is polished for "what it is", about the same as a demo. Also

7 Replies 45,936 Views

Never heard of 5 before, who even accepts payment from another individual by check? Sounds like you're asking to lose the money. Thank you for this post, christmas shopping is ripe with scammers and whatnot. Staying safe helps keep the spirit of the season alive.

10 Replies 24,618 Views

What's up with that anyway? I always hear about Australia prices being 50% higher, but I've not seen a good explanation as to why.

29 Replies 83,048 Views

I'd like to think that digital distribution and the competition it brings is the reason games haven't gone up in price the last 15 years. I remember looking at AAA+ games back when I was a kid, and they cost 50-60 USD back then. Add some inflation on that, and it's actually kind of amazing that AAA+ games still cost 50-60 USD today. Plus now you get the seasonal sales from Amazon / Origin / Steam / GOG / Gamefly / Gamersgate / everything else.

29 Replies 83,048 Views

I tried this a while back, I didn't find a workable solution unfortunately. A long work-around was to put the bloodline itself in the trait tree, then have stuff depend only on that and a unitstat given by another trait.

844 Replies 1,926,572 Views

I like the look of the units a lot more than the dreadnaught's.

9 Replies 44,872 Views

DJ, spin that shit! [video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD45pZjmQCE[/video]

39 Replies 192,921 Views

With respect, the game E:wom is not a diamond in the rough. The game was universally panned, and even abandoned by the devs so they could work on FE instead (because making a whole new game just made sense). If it could be polished, I'd be willing to look at a DLC. It does not need polishing. It needs to have whole game systems re-built from the ground up. And THEN you can start adding what's missing in terms of content and gameplay. You should not be asking E:wo

206 Replies 1,572,193 Views

[quote who="cardinaldirection" reply="39" id="3425129"]how anyone could say no to this^ is beyond me. yes, please![/quote] Because we remember what E:wom was like, and it was horrible compared to even FE. - Factions were almost identical - Heroes were extremely generic with no unique traits or such, and of course no level-up traits - Content was lacking - few special items, few monsters in the world - Combat balance was silly - Spell system was

206 Replies 1,572,193 Views

Aye, all set up now with a whole new computer. No, I mean like abilities and items that for example "deal extra damage against enemies that count as champions" may and may not work against DLC units.

544 Replies 1,094,167 Views

@Frogboy are there any features you think would add to either product that are missing? I'm talking about both marketed and new features.

9 Replies 36,420 Views

I played E:wom last summer and compared it to FE, it was still garbage at the last patch. You've spent years improving on E:wom to reach FE:LH, which is borderline great. The only reason to do an E:wom release would be so people can see how bad it was, because that will be what people will think. The only redeeming feature of E:wom compared to FE:LH is the dynasty system. You'd be far better off building a DLC pack with that in the game for FE:LH instead. I can totally

206 Replies 1,572,193 Views

That's very cool but also kind of silly. It gets 3 guesses on each symbol and if either of those was right it counts as a red mark. It also fakes some as red marks even if they were green, like if it guessed the letter i and you put a 1 it still counts as red. So... for each symbol (assuming you only use letters and numbers, which of course you don't have to) it has a higher than 10% chance of getting a red mark just by non-consequential guessing. I think I ended up with about 15% red

17 Replies 36,366 Views