Luckmann

[quote who="Scoutdog" reply="14" id="2240646"]Indeed Now that I do some digging, the devs never actually SAY that any spells will cost essance: that was purely a community assumption.[/quote]It really depends what you consider a spell. I'd say that revitalizing the land could definately be considered a spell. But I don't think that anything but possibly the most world-wrecking spells will cost Essance, if any spells will cost essance at all (which I still somewhat doubt). Other than t

[quote who="Scoutdog" reply="11" id="2240642"]I'm just saying that something like a Samurai flag and something like a bag of money (that actually does something to the unit's stats) shouldn't compete for space. If so, none of the pretty-looking stuff would be used, becuse you would have to conserve that space for things that confer a benifit.[/quote]When I say a samurai flag, I mean an actual piece of misc item, conferring a bonus of some sort. Likewise, the bag of monies, with some s

[quote who="Scoutdog" reply="9" id="2240533"]I don't like the idea of functional items and eye candy taking up the same "space". Then you would really not have a chance to use any of the look stuff, as all your space would be used on practicals. [...] [/quote]Apart from eye-candy eye-candy ("jewels" afaik), all gear would be eye-candy. A big bag of monies could be represented on your belt, the 'Samurai'-flag would obviously be be shown. Cape and cloaks are sel

[quote who="landisaurus" reply="7" id="2240453"]I'd be fine with a neck or back slot taking up the cape. You'd also want samurai style flags on your back perhaps. Of course the only alternative that I can imagine that wouldn't require you to use a cape would be to have x number of "accessory slots" that could go to armlets, belts, capes, or whatever. But then you have the problem is a limited number accessories where logically no limit might exist. H

Oh my god. I'd go inside and never come out. Ever.

[quote who="Demiansky" reply="3" id="2235112"]Yeah, Galactic Civilizations 2 minor races were basically just free planets to conquest oriented species or free, early trade locations for peaceful races. They never built a military, they never had any influence on the game, and they always built tons of constructors for reasons that will forever be nebulous. It would be refreshing to see minor opponents in Elemental that had some real teeth as well as have diplomatic options that ar

[quote who="Paradoxnt" reply="3" id="2238293"]All those who want bear cavalry should have Polar Bears snuck into their bedrooms late at night.....comon, it is for a good cause! Those Polar Bears are starving to death right now.[/quote]

[quote who="GmOOnii" reply="17" id="2237864"] [...] Master Yoda said "Mmm One master, One apprentice at a time there is only Mmm" so if Master Yoda is never wrong, then how come a spaceship full of sith lords? Aaah I can't wait to find out? [...] [/quote] http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Rule_of_two

[quote who="Tridus" reply="17" id="2237807"]I'm not really seeing what you problem is. No matter what, everyone has to be able to connect to the game host. For Internet games, the game host is Stardock. For LAN games, the game host is someone on the LAN. It's generally safe to assume everyone can connect to the host on a LAN. It's also generally safe to assume everyone can connect to a dedicated server environment. It's NOT safe to assume that everyone can connect to &lt

As long as there's not a specific 'cape' slot in gear, I hope something like capes are in. The reason capes as a gear-slot is annoying is because it basicly forces those of us that may not want capes to use them.

[quote who="Frogboy" reply="4" id="2237359"] LAN almost certainly . Hot seat maybe. PBEM, not sure yet.[/quote]So what you're really saying is that this whole "games are hosted by us, achtung!" is in all actuality optional ? Because I just can't really wrap my head around how "all will be hosted on our servers" and "you will be able to host your own LAN games" can co-exist.</p

Banned for being a dog.

Baldurdash! Hogwash! Poppycock! Banned for being a cheese.

Banned for not noticing that I have a new avatar.

Banned because I have more karma than you.

Crysis was actually one of the very few FPS I've enjoyed in recent memory. I didn't actually play Warhead, but I'm looking forward to seeing what they'll squeeze out this time.

[quote who="BigAbboTT" reply="11" id="2236872"]=/ How can you say that they aren't 'win' ? They are one of the most successful companies in the world. Their CEO is one of the richest men in the world. [...] [/quote]I suppose all depends on wheter or not you measure worth in monetary wealth.

[quote who="rendari" reply="6" id="2236804"]Microsoft is about as win as it gets.[/quote] "'tis truly a golden age of retardation when even Microsoft has fanbois"

I'm trying to figure out how to make a more craptastic list without it becoming intentionally hilarious. And I fail.

[quote who="Annatar11" reply="10" id="2236788"]If I lose, I'll be too busy revelling in the awesomeness that is Diablo 3 to have time to cuddle with Bertha.[/quote]Then I won't eat my bears if I lose. [e digicons]:typo:[/e]

[quote who="Annatar11" reply="5" id="2236308"]If you lose, I'm making you eat one of your precious cuddly bears.[/quote]And if you lose, I'll make you cuddle one of them. Specificly, Bertha.

Sorry, no. Microsoft is still massive fail.