It's on the internet, so it must be true.

P.S. If you want to debate physics, devote yourself to studying it.  And studying it doesn't amount to reading hits from google searches.

P.P.S. I'm writing this on the internet, so it's true.

....with better hairstyles.

Yes, but Ozzy says 'God is dead'...

Agreed. Mathematicians became physicists because to be successful, its not enough to be intelligent, you must also be tall and have good hair  .

Physics is observable reality and Mathematics is one of the tools of observation and description of physical reality.

The rejection is only of String Theory with its 26 dimensions and Big Bang Theory, not of Quantum Mechanics. ECE Theory expands on Einstein's Field Equations to include Torsion and so Quantum Theory is derived from ECE Theory along with other physical laws

http://www.aias.us/index.php?goto=showPageByTitle&pageTitle=Equations_flowcharts

While going through an online calculus page, there was this

http://www.understandingcalculus.com/chapters/11/11-5.php

We come across numerous articles and “news” items agreeing with string theory or big bang theory, and the intensity of information adds up incrementally to such a magnitude that any alternate theory tends to be rejected out of hand.

This technique of “intensity” of information is also used by most news outlets. The communists / socialists / democrats are always shown with good headlines / pictures and the conservatives / capitalists are always shown alongwith a negative news item (eg “crony capitalism”)

Physics is WYSIWIG – What You See is What You Get

String Theory is WYTITWIRL – What You Theorize is Totally Worthless In Real Life

Catholic church doesn’t really need to have this Big Bang Theory (BBT) millstone hanging around its neck. BBT was proposed by a catholic priest, which may explain the current support by the church. BBT depends on the expanding universe theory and so called observation of the Cosmic Background Radiation (CMB).

The idea of god may die with one of the following:

1. Humanity conquers death

2. Humanity goes to the stars and discovers an alien species

3. Aliens visit earth.

We cant do anything about 3), We are doing something about 1), and with Myron Evans ECE theory we may be able to do something about 2)  - http://www.aias.us/documents/DeviceDev/VPwp06.pdf

Mathematics is all tautology, so to speak, as it is inherently true....in other words, it is true because it has to be true since that is the only way mathematics (and logic) could possibly work....

As physics becomes more and more mathematical, we more closely approach the notion that physics is all tautology...that should greatly appeal to you, since it would prove that there is only one way the universe could possibly be structured (a notion that generally appeals to deistic thinkers)...of course we aren't there yet: for example, we have yet to derive certain physical constants, they simply are observables for now....

With that in mind...

You can't criticize String Theory because it is purely mathematical, yet support Quantum Mechanics which is also purely mathematical...

There was a time where Quantum Mechanics fit into the "totally worthless" category...we had yet to confirm it through multiple experiments and the theory had thus far yielded no practical applications...

Today however QM has practical applications...it has allowed us to prove why atoms bond the way they do by describing how electrons fill energy levels...it has explained the double slit experiment with light and the wave-particle duality....it has given us insight into the strong force and why certain nuclei are unusually stable....it has explained why neutrinos change flavors and if neutrinos were to be shown to be capable of FTL travel, it is ready to explain that via the mass eigenstates of neutrinos...I assume you are aware of most or all of these things...

All those things are purely mathematical, yet very real and confirmed by experimentation (in the case of FTL neutrinos, could be confirmed by experimentation)...

String Theory, to my knowledge, has not yet yielded any applications, but QM didn't either right when it was developed...furthermore, a theory being purely mathematically is poor reasoning to condemn it...you would be better off questioning its testability or using the argument of economy instead of disowning it because it's all math...

As for ECE, I never seen anything supporting it beyond a "personal" webpage...

FYI, the general feeling amongst the scientific community is that gravity is not a true "force" but a result of bending/warping/distorting space-time (mass being the obvious suspect for why this distortion would occur)...therefore, it is likely that attempts to "unify" gravity with the other forces are completely futile...

Its hasnt reached FUBAR yet, its still at the SNAFU stage - Situation Normal, All ...

Regarding the previous quote from Ozzy, whatever information bubbles up from Oz has to be viewed through the prism of these factoids which indicate that things are somewhat topsy-turvy environmentally, biologically and legislatively

- During summer, its winter in Oz and vice versa

- The land has black swans and great big jumping mice with pockets

- Voting is compulsory ($20 fine if you cant vote)

Even the laws of physics operate confusingly - Water spirals anti-clockwise down the drain down under.

In Technological News - Military contractors unveiled an advanced, bilaterally-symmetric drone. “Its beautiful, sexy, and deadly to the opposition” They announced. “Conservatively, we’ve Christened it the Sarah Palin-drone”

And back to news in Physics -

Einstein concluded that gravity is curvature of spacetime, but as per Myron Evans he neglected torsion of spacetime, which manifests as electromagnetism. Using Cartan mathematics ECE theory “unifies” gravity with electromagnetism.

Since gravity has already been explained in ECE theory, Evans says that attempts to measure “gravity waves” is futile. But you never know – even the non-existent “2.7K blackbody” was purported to be “found” by the COBE satellite (and corrobored by WMAP and supported by PLANCK satellites).

http://dreamheron.wordpress.com/2013/05/01/big-bang-relic-radiation-then-now/

“Higgs Boson” was “found” too, but Evans disagrees http://www.aias.us/documents/uft/a224thpaper.pdf

sorry clicked the wrong icon ... twice mea culpa

Whenever an article compares missing WMDs in Iraq to the Big Bang theory, it's hard to take it seriously...