Twohawks

[quote]If 3 5/2 soldiers in a group are still three 5/2 soldiers, then its not much of an issue, but its a huge issue if three 5/2 soldiers in a group instantly become a single 15/6 soldier.[/quote] See not sure I see it as bad as you.. because we all have same option to merge... so we all could create equally powerful units for weaker ones..seems fairly balanced to me in that respect.. however I do see your point, and I do like the three 5/2 soldiers vs 15/6 soldier as a bett

[quote who="KillzEmAllGod" reply="9" id="2703796"]starcraft 2 had a beta to test game play, elemental's was for almost for everything and i was it is quit horrid with all the chaos, not saying it was bad just feel like i should have waited for it to be finished instead of getting annoyed at crash / broken thing. and calling some one a retarded isn't nice. if i had my way maths would be before english.[/quote] If this is you first Strardock Beta well it would

[quote who="Zawath" reply="7" id="2703514"]I'm disappointed that you decided to remove the ingame editor because that would have been more accessible to a lot more people.[/quote] I have to agree here.. it was fun to create a quick and dirty race and get in and play it..

In another thread on this same subject (a week or so ago) I suggested a partial solution for this.. at least with caravans. I suggested a building tech (lets call it a caravan guard guild) that allows us to spend gold to hire guards to protect them.. that or allow us to upgrade caravans with weapons (or make a traders pack) so we can make caravans that can protect them selves.. [e digicons]^_^[/e]

[quote]They just need to be in the same group [/quote] you can also trade by dragging the item to the hero/champion portrait or even a stack on the map...

[quote who="egable" reply="94" id="2703000"]Rings: - Different sizes: Small, Medium, Large - 2 small + 1 medium per finger - 4 small per finger - 2 medium per finger - 1 large per finger [/quote] [quote]I also agree that limiting enchantment stacking is a good thing. Magical items with the same enchantments should not stack (you apply the highest one only), but different enchantments that buff the same trait

[quote]G4’s Xplay is our first stop. It’ll be the first time that the finalized UI system starts to get shown.[/quote] when is the episode airing? I do not want to miss it heh heh

side note, through diplomacy you can trade for a hero from another sovereign and marry that way as well.

beta closed last Thursday.. after 4 released ... so ya have to wait..[e digicons]:'([/e]

Count down to thread lock....

FYI for those like me who did not know... lower number for example speed of 50 is faster.

nice work.. [e digicons]k1[/e]

some very intresting ideas there.. I like it.. [e digicons]k1[/e] Stardock make it so .... [e digicons]:grin:[/e]

but ya have to admit a good one ... only thing I don't like is 2 ring limit.. I more like one ring of type limit with 10 ring max.. but i can deal what ever way it goes.. none the less great idea's and nice presentation Malloreon ... [e digicons]k1[/e]

another thought.. I am not against only one ring of type I posted this in another ring discussion thread..(some where heh), essentially allow us many rings but only get benefit of one of type, then make more rings like ring of +1 fire damage and so on to add more variety while applying a minor sanity check... however I can live with out this heh heh.

[quote who="Thiryn" reply="6" id="2701479"] Quoting SpaghettiMon, reply 5I think a "World of Darkness" mod would be better. Or Ravenloft.[/quote] either.. of these...

I agree with Sara here.. ten fingers ten rings is not to much.. I also support multiple amulets.. packs, cloaks, and boots not so much.. I can deal with what ever mechanic we end with but the multiple ring thing i like...

Agreed! fully should be just that.. as long as we honor alliance should be no issue.. simple fix is before an attack can be made on any ally tiles, alliance must be broken which forces all units from former ally's land before allowing attack.. another method to prevent the ally rush ( where we ally with nation only to move troops to attack close to capital) add a negative modifier to future alliances call it diplomatic reputation you can use this for any abusive or negative act to make

We have had several threads discussing things like this and other cool sources for quests like bounty boards (mind you not griping about this thread more letting you know others feel same and had similar ideas [e digicons]:grin:[/e] ).. response was these ideas (including ones tied to inns like yours here) were a good idea and might be something to look at for a future releases/update..

actually in 3c it was tech related it is no longer... my current warfare is level 4 logistics, equipment, weaponry, and ranged and all i have to do is hit the "x" key to delete... either it got disconnected, is hooked to some earlier tech, on accident or the text linking it to tech is in error in beta 4 [e digicons]:D[/e]

I have to agree here.. we need an option to disable auto unit creation.. I can make my own much more effectively..

you can build on any resource in your towns area of control, click on said resource choose build option...

just an fyi so far when I exit or on crash elemental still runs for 20 + seconds in process tab even though gone in application tab.. it does finally result in an error and generates standard let microsoft know window...

this is an odd one... I attack Umbar's last city. and then after tactical combat city and army are no longer selectable.. repeatable.. however after auto resolve city is mine and all is well.. also repeatable. This one i thought you really needed to see.. before tactical attack: <a href="http:

[quote]Imagine if you will that AOW or MOM used this method all those years ago with another company that went under. You could not play those games today if you wanted to for old times sakes.[/quote] unless you still had copies of these games. all I need to do is archive game and current updates to usb storage device and i still have it baring the bizarre.. Let alone the fact that by the time said failures occur and stardock is no longer around how long will it take for others to off