marigoldran

marigoldran

Joined Member # 5438169
0 Posts 11 Replies 1,807 Reputation

[quote quoting="post"] OK, I see the point of these. Have extra manufacturing, pump it into something else. Birthing Subsidies is a godsend, and Cultural Festival, well, I'm using that to fook over the #1 power player right now, who happens to not be a warmonger (Iconian). But Research Project and Economic Stimulus are BORKED. I tried it on a planet where I had ALL Manufacturing (and yes Marigold, an approval building, as well as some fa

17 Replies 33,230 Views

[quote who="meteuremu" reply="9" id="3564840"] This is dumb, right now the only logical option is to completely ignore morale, get every planet you can, and crush your opponents with industry, wealth, and tech. No point even making morale buildings. I have 136 planets, and can pump out ships and troops faster than the rest of the galaxy combined. [/quote] Exactly. There ISN'T a reason to build anything besides factories and po

23 Replies 86,630 Views

Such as, for example, a factory and a farm on the same tile. But building on top of another building costs 5x the normal production cost compared to building it on an empty tile. Sort of makes sense if you think about it. Consequently, in the late game planets can be built up a lot more than before. Thoughts? The issue here is that currently in the late game, after you've filled up your worlds, the only thing left to build is carrier

1 Replies 2,847 Views

What's the point of building an approval building when you can just plop a factory there in place of it? Personally I think developers created the concept of "morale improving buildings" to confuse the player and make them play worse. They're a trap that will lead you away from the most optimal path. I know I'm not very smart, but any other explanations for why developers created the concept of "morale improving buildings" don't make sense.

56 Replies 175,136 Views

[quote who="TurielD" reply="1" id="3564620"] Hmm, that's an interesting one. They'd basically not be able to grow your population until you can capture pop with other planets, so you'd have to send colonizers with 0.1 pop to each planet. If you take Pioneering for a bit of pop and later the 5 loaded transports you're over 20bilion - technically enough to hold 200 worlds. For the rest, you'd have to captur

7 Replies 19,190 Views

The issue is in the late game the -25% production and -25% growth from bad morale is more than cancelled by the +100% bonus from the extra factory after accounting for the adjacency bonuses. Patriotic in the early game allows colony spam without having to worry about morale. In the early game the -25% from bad morale is actually a big deal and Patriotic can avoid it. Also, I would like to point out that Colonizers is OUTRIGHT better than Engineering. The reason is

56 Replies 175,136 Views

Planet management is very simple: Build one hospital (upgrades to fertility center) and one to two farms and one food distribution on each planet. The rest of the planet should be filled with factories and/or power plants and/or production buildings. Trade for harmony crystals. For larger maps pick up Patriotic and/or Malevolence Level 2 (free approval upon conquest). All other alternatives are inefficient. &nbsp

2 Replies 12,962 Views

The reason I'm asking is because Thalan tech tree provides Hives and the Gaia Vortex. Both of which provide big boosts to base production thereby avoiding the "I have no population and thus no production" problem that all synthetic races have in the early game. Thalan tech line won't provide the Spark of Life path. On the other hand you get better early game factories, and the AWESOME Hives tech (which gives a +4 to production REGARDLESS of what your population on

7 Replies 19,190 Views

[quote who="dansiegel30" reply="1" id="3564609"] Have you EVER built a fookin approval building in all your games?? [/quote] As a matter of fact, I haven't. Because they take up space and are otherwise useless. Much better to build factories and conquer planets to get the approval bonus. [e digicons]:D[/e] [e digicons]:D[/e] I always choose the most efficient option. If the option doesn't appear efficient I WON'T EVEN BOTHER TO

56 Replies 175,136 Views

[quote quoting="post"] I tried playing the Yor recently, and found their first 50 or so turns to be stupidly hard. The production buildings seem to be only a third as good as the basic factory and I cant seem to get enough population to start colonizing efficiently. Any Idea what I would be doing wrong? [/quote] That's one of the things I hate about playing the Yor. They should at least start with good factories. Instead of playing the Yor

3 Replies 13,295 Views

[quote who="Captain Patch" reply="13" id="3564606"] Started to play the game after 11 p.m. PDT. As I suspected, no lagging whatsoever. Whatever/whoever is interfering with the game during office hours. [/quote] Wait, what? You can play this game during work?

60 Replies 129,102 Views

It's the way the LEP system works. The problem is LEP takes morale points away from the base pool. So if you have +20 morale on your planets from starbase and buildings, but have 100 planets, your morale will be exactly ZERO even if you have +600% morale boost, because 0*6=0. [EDIT: Wait a second. Is this right? I wouldn't know because I'm good at math and so I ALWAYS take Patriotic or Malevolence level 2 and so I don't pa

56 Replies 175,136 Views

[quote who="admiralWillyWilber" reply="49" id="3564404"] what are the iconian genders. [/quote] "Despite decades of years of study by xenologists on the Iconian reproductive system, there is still much left that is unknown or misunderstood. The best current model in explaining their genders is the color model: with three primary colors 'red, green, and blue' and two shades of each. It takes the mixing of two colors to create children- with one major exce

205 Replies 673,123 Views

[quote who="TheBirthdayParty" reply="39" id="3564053"] What about another gender besides women eh? [/quote] What about another gender besides women OR men... eh?????? So misogynist and racist (literally- you're being racist against other species). THERE ARE MORE GENDERS OTHER THAN MEN OR WOMEN!!!! [e digicons]XO[/e] [e digicons]XO[/e] The Iconians for example have at least 6 genders. Think about it!!!

205 Replies 673,123 Views