[quote who="Raven X" reply="16" id="2721473"] Tits or no Tits, "The Dr" shouldn't be a woman [/quote]You understand that that makes no sense as I already stated he is not a woman (crappy drawing skills justify anything!!!). :P Plus, he is not The Doctor but The Sovereign (and my Wizzy Avatar, which happens to be male and with long hair). XD
I prefer it "out" now and to have it added later with bells and whistles than to have it now half-baked. That said, I liked what we had back in Beta... 2? I think it worked pretty nice for some basic "race/faction" thingy. XD And already mentioned many times, modding a faction in XML is not difficult. The only trouble it has would be things like colours (people can get confused with the RGBs) or pointing to files. Nothing that cannot be solved with a XML Faction mold with a
[quote who="-Pagan-" reply="134" id="2722543"]Well, I'm not exactly happy to read I'm spending $70.00 on a game that sounds like it needed another few weeks of polishing, but I'm looking forward to getting my CE. I am putting faith in Stardock that any issues will be addressed in a timely manner. I like supporting indie devs, and sometimes I get burned (Mortal Online). I just don't get the feeling this will be the case with Elemental. [/quote]The probability of getting
[quote who="glucero0" reply="13" id="2722183"]It's easy to be a fanboy. Try being critical for a change instead of just giving Brad and his crew a free ticket. You have no problem criticizing me...[/quote]What's up, troll?
Well, it will be a nice thing to come back from work and have the game waiting for download. :D Only around 15 hours more for me... XD
[quote who="delijoe79" reply="13" id="2721286"] Quoting Wintersong, reply 12 Quoting SuperZERO0, reply 4Don't forget Doctor Who! Reduced 82%Original 158 x 535 Hey, the doctor cant be female, that's blasphemy [/quote]Where do you see tits? :P *blames crappy drawing style* XD
[quote who="Sethfc" reply="9" id="2721386"]There is no DRM but you Have to activate it the First time it runs. Its there way of protecting from retailers breaking their street date. Sorry guys. And impulse is NOT required to run it nor is anything else it just has to connect one time to activate is all. Afterwards internet is never required.[/quote]Wasn't activation just when you try to get patches? Maybe it's just some kind of date check
[quote who="SuperZERO0" reply="4" id="2720533"]Don't forget Doctor Who![/quote] [e digicons]:-"[/e] [e digicons]:-"[/e]
[quote who="Raven X" reply="3" id="2721151"]I'm working on a custom skin, putting My Face into the game for use on my custom Sovereign....mwhhahahaha.[/quote]There is already a face/beard combo apparently similar to that pic of yours. Unless you are hoping for "Total Realism" Sovereign. :P
Army of Capitar... 666... :P Very cool. Very very cool. :) A pity that there is no video of the battle. Would have been awesome.
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="67" id="2721065"]It'll still be a couple of hours. Bear in mind we're between gold and day 0 so we're having to put this stuff together. We weren't even planning on being here today.[/quote]And we thank you all for your efforts. :) If I'm still awake for when you release it... I may not sleep much. XD Maybe I should go to bed now... or turn off the computer and read some Dark Tower...
[quote who="Takeitsy" reply="4" id="2720914"]Yes, a bit of mercy for those of us that are on Europe; the night is near and tomorrow we must get up early .[/quote]Today sleep is optional in Europe. XD [quote who="Frogboy" reply="10" id="2720925"]Some of us just got up. [/quote]Lazy CEO, lazy! :P
So... the review is based on a Beta build? Without mentioning that it's based on a Beta build? I suppose that the game will have its... "features" in Gold version but hopefully not many. And Day 0 patch should be great.
[quote quoting="post"] So as I did for my previous favorite game SoaSE, I'll be scouring the web for Elemental reviews and posting them here. That way there will be a single location where we can navigate to all the reviews of the game, for easy reference. If you happen to find one I don't post, leave a comment below it in the following format: Site Name Score WWW Link I hope this will be made sticky by someone from SD
I'm only surprised that it hasn't been Game Stop. Due to... lets be good guys and suppose it's just incompetence... to spread the word about "Hey, release date isn't supposed to be yet ergo multiplyer won't be avaiable yet and not because it doesn't work due to bugs" would be interesting. Or something like that.
Conspiracy theory: dirty players or incompetent ones?
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="30" id="2719797"]I wish flying units were widely available in the game. It would make AI coding a LOT easier. [/quote]Gal Civ III? :P
Roland 314, Verga 218. And Verga almost wins? XD Very cool. :)
[quote who="Raven X" reply="1" id="2719630"]Not bad hehe. Next time you might want to stay away from the Yellow text. I can just barely see it.[/quote]Said by someone who likes to highlight his text with red... ;) Just darken the yellow a bit?
[quote who="MageMatthew" reply="7" id="2719056"]Launches Impulse Now ... Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits Refresh, Hits
[quote who="GW Swicord" reply="6" id="2718859"] Quoting clockwerk, reply 5...How do I get divorced? Your Sovereign can get "divorced" by sending the spouse, without any equipment or bodyguards, to the nearest and strongest monster or enemy army available. Seriously. Here's hoping it works that way in the release version. In the last beta version, I had a dead spouse stuck on my dynasty page and no marriage options for my sovereign appearing on selected champions.
[quote who="Tridus" reply="60" id="2718442"] Quoting Wintersong, reply 58 Antagonizing what, Sir? That the whole game is bad because of the lack of a feature*? If Tactical Battles were off in SP I would say the same as for MP. So you seem to be very wrong. STFU? Suuuuure. Crystal clear or must I elaborate more? * for which I haven't positioned myself in this thread about if I agree about it's lack or not. This is your idea of not antagonizing? Or this:<br
[quote who="Tridus" reply="50" id="2718420"]2. Single player folks antagonizing people just need to STFU in a thread about MP. Seriously. Since we just got asked what we want in MP, saying tactical battles is entirely legitimate. If tactical battles were suddenly turned off in SP, would you really say "But yeah, you must be part of those for which the battles are the most important part of a game" in response? I don't think so. They were put in for a reason (hell, they went through
[quote who="ddd888" reply="44" id="2718392"] there comes the fanboy invasion thread ruined gg [/quote]Why? Because I slaped you with the truth? You are the one who says how super important are the tactical battles that to take them out of MP makes the whole game very bad. Won't miss you. :)
[quote who="Zawath" reply="41" id="2718373"]I think Stardock should stop treating MP gamers as second grade citizens. As long as you keep doing that your games will never develop a strong multiplayer community.[/quote]Which is quite logical and intended maybe? But Stardock is ready to listen and make changes according to whatever happens. Don't lose faith so easily. [quote who="Zawath" reply="41" id="2718373"]Taking tactical battles out of the multiplayer mode is a huge mistake and ma