Plato was doing religion then? Religions are control forms based on a supreme authority/entity/power, priests being the arbiters between the divine and the mundane which obviously grants them lots of power in societies where other kind of social structures hasn't been developed yet (except those ones who expand in all the areas of a society so they can have total control of it and perpetuate themselves ad astra).
Your judeo-christian outlook betrays you again; religion doesn't even necessitate the existance of priests, or control mechanisms, they just tend to have them for a variety of reasons. In many older societies, there weren't even a distinction between the chief and the priest, whilst in others the elder(s) acted as spiritual guides and advisors. One example of a theistic society that weren't oppressed by religion that I enjoy bringing up was the ancient norse, where the stories of the gods and the lessons taught often had much more meaning than the divine personas themselves, and all gods were presented as aspects of man.
And yes, Plato did dabble in religious philosophy, even if I doubt that he defined it as such himself. A lot of philosophy blurs the line between the human and the divine, and deals with it. Many philosophers, including Plato, were religious and proponents of a wide range of religions, and used that outlook in their philosophies.
Plato was thus "doing religion" in the sense that his philosophies touched on the religious, but in no way or form did he propagate or create his own religion. He was merely operating within the confines of his own.
I'll concede to the second definition but not to the Wikipedia one.
Which is fair enough, because the wikipedia article doesn't offer a definition in that excerpt, it merely offers a general outlook on religion that is very inclusive. The definition is the one from the dictionary, which also happens to be the first paragraph of the wikipedia article.
Also, Benjamin Franklin was origin of something that would become the most powerful philosophy. Get his ideals, strip them from religious values and what do you get? Capitalism. Or should we consider Capitalism a religion too?
Heh, funny you should mention capitalism, since it is entirely possible to call capitalism a form of religion, depending on your definition of capitalism (which is, I've found, very diverse). Worshipping monetary wealth and economic progress, satisfaction of the own ego held in high regard, the fullfillment of the self, consumerism as the meaning of life and materialism as the sole judge of earthly value - it quickly starts to sound like a religion. Almost like a..
secular religion.
Jedi are considered religion in some State of the USA or so I heard.
Jedi... Hmmm Can we have Cheddar Monks in Elemental?
The UK, if I'm not mistaken.
Also, no. [e digicons]
[/e]