Please apple, can you just say. "We make cool sh#t, buy our stuff." without trash talking everyone else and making yourself look like snobs. I think the answer to that is pretty obvious.
Tarkus
You would expect them to say their products are no longer necessary?
If BitDefender keeps rootkits off my system I'm going to buy it pronto!!! How are you getting rootkits on your system?
alright so windowblinds is the better program. I'm not saying the comments here are wrong, but keep in mind that you're at a Stardock site now. You might get different answers if you were to ask at a more StyleXP friendly site. I'm just sayin'. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/wc/smiles/Wink.gif" align="absmiddle" bor
For another glimpse into the anti-Mac sentiment, just read the comments following any article about anything Windows-related at CNET. The obnoxious Mac fanboys gravitate to those articles like vultures, to tell everyone how Windows sucks at everything and Macs are a near religious experience. It's annoying as hell.
How many laptops do you suppose have been sold with XP pre-installed? How many legitimate reports have you seen (not heard second-hand) of laptops being disabled by WGA? Do the math.
Microsoft has NEVER met an initial publicized deadline and has NEVER released a bug-free Operating System. As opposed to all those other operating systems that were released without bugs.
Since when has Microsoft cared whether a product is actually ready before they release it? If they didn't care, it would already be out. They've already delayed it a number of times because it wasn't ready. That has cost them money and embarrassment. So clearly, they do care. And yes, it will have bugs, no matter how long it's delayed. It
I voted They're OK for the new forums. They're an improvement over the previous forums, but they still lack features of more popular forums. And the inexplicable continued use of non-standard BBCode tags means tags generated by Firefox extensions and other sites, such as image hosts, don't work. That one just baffles me. Edit: Then there's th
People should do a clean install anyway, regardless of what the matrix says.
Apparently.
I don't think it's the batteries so much as it's the circuitry that's supposed to prevent them from overcharging, and in turn, overheating.
Last.fm , a fantastic community for music lovers!
What point are you trying to make with the Pinto reference?
Email notifications link to the front page instead of to the thread, at least for threads from news items. For example, this is the link I received for Kazaa Settles with Record Labels for $100,000,000 .
Hey guys, can anybody tell me what the "SVCHOST.EXE" process is all about? It uses almost 2,000 handles and it has "sub-friends"! http://www.google.com/search?q=svchost.exe
Actually, McDonald's has been sued for just that.
Though I certainly wouldn't expect the RIAA to be too generous in distributing that $100M to the artists. After all, their theft is perfectly legal.
That's a great point, DesignCaddy! The people who automatically press OK for everything are exactly the people who should have this thrust upon them. The people who are more responsible can decide for themselves.
So, it is ironic to note that it won't install without passing WGA so it's another example of where the pirates are going to be safe from possible problems with this new code, while the average legitimate user has to actually choose not to install it to be safe. I think this is a good example of why spyware
Geez, it's not exactly rocket science. No wait, actually, it is.
They haven't gone far enough. When they start paying me to use their services, then I'll consider it.
It's funny how the Microsoft bashers only see what they want to see. No matter what they do, those people always see it as something evil. Bill Gates could cure AIDS and they'd bitch that he didn't cure cancer. It's almost humorous to read the comments for any CNET article that has anything to do with Microsoft. No matter what the story's about, the vast majority of comments are negative, often brutally.