Actually, Jobeleca, I've been using either Mozilla or Netscape 7.0 as my default browser for a long time. I figure that only something with Netscape's name on it actually qualifies as a "coporate AOL thing". I probably shouldn't admit to having an AOL screen name tucked away, but like you, I only use it for testing. Well, that and the fact that every time I call to cancel, they give me more months free to keep "evaluating" it. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/smile.gif" border=
geekboy2000
I use either Mozilla 1.1 or Netscape 7 for all of my browsing needs, but that might soon change. Phoenix, in only it's .1 milestone really does a great job, and it feels *fast*! Check it out: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/phoenix/phoenix-release-notes.html
Sort of like the "Century 21" of web portals?
Lecrayon, I agree that it's a tough subject to agree on, but I maintain, as I mentioned earlier, that few if any art galleries or museums, who of course appreciate art more than the average bear, are going to allow any random person to hang their stuff on their walls. It might all be "art", but that label alone doesn't make it worthy of display.
I'm laughing as I imagine a laptop with a mini projector that pops out and projects the image onto the old type roll-up (as Bill_Sawyer mentioned above) movie screen! There might even be that little telescopic rod and hook gizmo. If you want it bigger still, detach the projector and move it! Hey, I guess we'd need to get the operator out of the way though.
. . . what hell hath I wrought? One thing I'd like to interject at this point, as the thread has taken a few turns since I originated it: The people posting here, myself included, are posting because they care about DA. Either because they now visit and contribute, or because they once did. I just think it's worth noting, although I guess it's obvious. Definitely lots of good thoughts here thou
I think if it were my site, I'd add a field to the submission form (I'm assuming there's not one already), that *requires* the submitter to summarize their thoughts/intent/expression about the piece of work they're uploading in a paragraph. For example: "Man mooning city hall expresses my frustration with our town government". Okay, fine - this guy is expressing an idea via an image that he cares enough about to describe his thoughts. OTOH, "My ex mowing the lawn", probably isn't worth the spac
jark wrote: >this kind of reasonable discussion could >very well have taken place on deviantART >if you had approached it in a far different >manner. I did, and the thread was closed (by you, I believe) after about 8 comments. Nothing addressed, no discussion like you posted here, just a terse reply, and "thread closed". >deviantART is *NOT* concerned with quantity >over quality. We choose not to moderate, >as a standard policy, because we are an <
migellito wrote: >i don't think that's what is going on at da >though.. i think they've just decided to >post it all and let god sort it out.. hehe Exactly, Only they apparently haven't passed word on to God that he's been charged with the job.
I appreciate everyone's comments. As craeonics said above, *this* kind of reasonable discussion would not have occurred on the other site. Also, I have to respectfully disagree with Karlie. Artistic expression can take many forms, as can political commentary. (Frank Zappa comes to mind). But, there's a difference between creating expression, or voicing a political/religous belief, and just nailing something to a bulletin board. And, the latter is what I feel there is far too much of on
Mike, pretty much, that's my point. They're big, with a lot of their size (Treetog mentioned over 500,000 files) being worthless junk, and I think the junk to quality ratio is increasing daily. I'm not saying that any of the DA staff aren't good people personally. I'm just saying that in my opinion they should be a lot more critical of what's accepted on the site.
Okay, yes, I did need to "vent". But, ask yourself (as you did), "Why would someone post a gripe about another web site here?". Because, I have posted such a comment on their site (as have others), and they (with an attitude too, as far as I'm concerned) defend the "anything goes" mentality with fervor. Or, they gripe that they don't have the staffing to enfore things. There are threads related to some of the content on other boards as well, and guess what? Those threads are on *those* boards be
Apparently, if you can digitize it and upload it, it's allowable on DA. It may have always been that way, and I just didn't notice it, but I think things have gotten worse. Over a period of weeks or months, you'll see "art" that embraces a hate group mentality, "artwork" consisting of someone sitting on the couch, and probably a terabyte of other useless crap. Oh, and maybe a few nice wallpapers or skins. But, yes, I must remember the name of the site is Deviant*ART*, so I guess that explains th
LeCrayon wrote: >I am wondering, if one uses the same >paintprogram and the same size of the bitmap >of an original skin, and you recolour the >bitmap you can speak of ripping? I have done that to themes for my own use, as I'm sure many folks have. It's a great way, and an easy way to get started learning. I have zero skills as a graphic/digital artist, so I used existing apps for tweaking. But - I never uploaded any of them, nor would I even consider it. The only skin
I think that what I see most often is the connection limitation. I suppose they're trying to run as lean and mean as possible, but sometimes exceed the number of connections allowed by the license. Thanks all for the info!
I understand that, but I've never seen that kind of error here at WC, so I was wondering about these "other guys", and why they can't run a site/database that doesn't spew errors when it gets overloaded. It's as if a truck is overloaded with weight. Okay fine, run slow, stall out, but don't shoot parts through the hood.
I totally agree with you Davad70. There are only so many things you can do with some components, and most everyone is inspired by someone else's style. I'm not saying any of what I've seen is an outright rip. I'm just saying some of them look *so* similar they stand out more for that reason then they do for the theme itself.
What is it with mySQL? Is it the traffic on these sites that brings mySQL to it's knees or the other way around? Neowin used to suffer from it, now ThemeXP regularly spits out mySQL erros, and ieXbeta is now similarly affected. If a site can't stand the traffic, why can't it be configured to simply be slow? That's bad enough, put presenting the viewer with a string of errors looks like sh*t.
I came here to post an almost identical subject, and it seems you beat me to it. In general, a *lot* of skins have looked a lot like adni18's work lately.
I sure do remember, and the "cover" was very appropriate. Great site for sure.
This is great: http://www.theonion.com/onion3833/bush_wont_stop_asking.html
Cookies are ready, hiccups are gone, yes! At the moment, it seems to work fine. Thank you!
Tarkus: From what I've seen from Canadian people's posts around the net, nothing there can legally be called "free", unless it is totally without cost of any kind (no shipping, handling, required purchase, etc). If that's so, it makes so much sense, I'm ready to cross the border!
I tend to agree with João. Yes, SkinBrowser is beta, but it's not early beta, and this problem has been occuring for awhile now. It's been reported here and on the newsgroups, and it's frustrating that it's still an issue. Frustrating too is that I have no idea what version I'm really using because the version number doesn't report as correct in the last few releases. I've downloaded .99D twice, and it still reports .99b (that's after deleting the earlier version).
I used to see this happen a lot more, but now today again, my Universe Metal theme choice for this site, changed to default after reading the message board. My login remained correct though.