I appreciate everyone's help, but I just tried ShellOn v2 again, and again, it does nothing at boot/start-up. I have read and re-read the configuration instructions (they're not all that complicated), but it's as if it's not there at all, and it *is* set as my default shell. Another odd thing, the "reboot" button does nothing - maybe related. In any case, for me on XP Pro, ShellOn isn't doing anything. I found a few other alternatives at the site mentioned above, but the Carapace link is down, s
geekboy2000
Does anyone know which specific shell swapper is "safe" to use with XP? I grabbed a few, but the executables are dated 1998 or 1999, and I can't imagine how they'd work with XP. Thanks
Thanks Z71. I'll give that a shot in the morning. I tried Shellon (both versions), and it didn't do anything at all. I had it set to act as the shell, and prompt me, but it regardless of how I had it set, XP just booted up normally. I'll look for the shell swapper. Thanks!
I just grabbed shellon v2 (there's a beta 3, but hmmm, I don't know. Anyway, I'll give it a shot. Thanks!
I grabbed the latest indie distro, but I'm a bit queasy about trying it without a "failsafe" shell swapper of some kind. Any recommendations? Thanks!
The best solution I found is Mailshell (http://www.mailshell.com). In addition to providing a mail account, you can create disposable addresses, and do lots more. It's best feature is that you can add up to three other e-mail accounts, and they'll be passed through Mailshell's "cleaning" process and delivered to your preferred inbox. I currently have two of my most heavily spammed accounts processed that way, and I haven't looked back. They claim something like 99% accuracy in filtering, and I'd
As far as I'm concerned, the idea of supporting a web site financially goes beyond just the content. I support Stardock/Wincustomize for the web content but also for the applications, support and development. If Wincustomize and Stardock where only a showcase for skins, I doubt very much I'd support it with cash. Although it might be a Utopian view, I still remember the net of around 1994 or so, and I believe things could end up again as they were then. If Wincustomize disappeared, or Yahoo's po
Well, given that it only happens when pop-ups are displayed, I'd grab a good pop-up killer. If you don't mind spending a few bucks, Pop-up Stopper Companion by Panicware works beautifully, and integrates into the IE toolbar. There are a million free alternatives though, and that way, you can enjoy Logika, *and* be free of those evil-doers. <A HREF="https://www.wincustomize.com/index.asp?Cmd=full&New
Outstanding! Definitely the best . . until the next Pixtudio suite.
I''d love to see how many of those who are registered users, were once using a pirated version, and for how long before the reg''d. I think these numbers say a lot, and support what I''ve always believed: Truly good software, like truly good artists (musicians or otherwise) will be supported by those who recognize the value of their contributions. BTW, FWIW, I will confess to using WB for a *long* extended trial period, before finally subscribing to ODNT. I now find myself supporting all of Star
Not quite ready I guess, or, as I''d expect, Network Solutions dropped the ball. The above link for Direct Skin reveals NS''s welcome page.
Well, Vagrant, I can't argue with that logic, but that means I actually have to read.
The reasons why I prefer to view and download only XP skins are, well, just my own preference. It's like having to offer a reason why I want Mozilla one click away in my quick-launch bar. I just like it that way. What's happened here, is that now an extra step or two has been added to what was a one-click process. It makes no sense at all to me.
The bottom line is that the most recent XP skins were one click away before. Even selecting check boxes before browsing adds more complexity to the process. Why "fix" what wasn't broken?
I agree. Running XP, I have no desire to wade through skins that don't support it.
What about "SkinTegrator"?