Grove12345

i think its supposed to be like the King Arthur game. Which had some high and low points. I too am interested in this game

played the first one when it came out. Too many movement issues. Controls were lacking. Played the second one. WOWWWWWWWWWWW. Amazing game. Best strategic shooter i ever played. So many ways to do a mission. Love the inventory and RPG system in the game. I tell my people about this game and i describe things that happen while in a mission, from getting my helmet shot off and picking it back up to having my friendly AI sniper save my life when i had a naz

i like realistic shooters, but most do it horribly wrong. Sometimes aiming, like in all Tom Clancy games, is tooooo easy. Other times in games like ARMAA movement is so non fluid and camera is swaying all over the place. Sometimes realistic damage is super unrealistic. Bullet to the chest from a 9m 200m away should do nothing. B/C OF ARMOR PLATES. My favorite tactical shooters are: Rainbow 6: 1. Remember you had to setup a plan before goi

[quote who="Bellack" reply="22" id="2793879"]I under stand your Apathy. I have been playing AOW until they come out with Ver 1.1 and then see if the game becomes fun to play. [/quote] ahh me too. Ive been playing AOW SM. BIG MISTAKE. Now i got no reason to go back to Elemental. :( AOW has it all

I love SWAT 3 back in the day. Havent tried it recently. But me and a friend were talking about it and thought how funny that the theme of this first person shooter, is not to shoot anyone. You get higher scores to make them surrender and put down a gun. So the point of the game is not to shoot anything. LOL Played SWAT 2 also. I actually liked it. First tactical real SWAT game i played. I remember it being buggy as freak, but still great memories.

thanks for the extensive explanation. I think im going to give this a shot now.

Ya im one of those people who for some reason was pissed that it was a stunt. I guess b/c it was done in such poor taste. And the community made themselves heard, and GOG apology was even stupider. The inaudible monks. but i dot support their idea. classic PC gaming, no DRM. $6.

game seems interesting and unique. $13 is semi hefty for an independent alpha game. Anyone here like it? And why?

is this game any good. Looks like a basic RTS to me. Why the love?

I remembering see thing game and wonder why BG got so much attnetion and this was only mediocre

If i can run Commandos 1 from GOG.com, A game made in 95, under windows 7 fine. Have some faith that this game will run for most Win 7 users.

I think alot of RPG fans and developers need to go try Demons Souls on PS3. After playing that game, standard RPG combat on PC or console just seems redundant and actually boring.

Why are people afraid to stick to what worked? And why not stick to gorgeous 2d instead of primitive 3d?

[quote who="Nikitosina" reply="4" id="2785245"] Nikitosina, even battle.net uses a client/server relationship, and I know WC3 (not sure about SC2) uses one of the clients as a host. Even if Stardock hosted the actual game (and not just as a cloud/connection service), they would still have to code the gameplay the same way. Theres just no avoiding sending and receiving data. Hi Troll, Thanks for another lection of client server tech Read my question once again please

[quote who="Gravedancer" reply="82" id="2783976"] Quoting SPMaverick, reply 81Whew... I just now heard about this from reading this thread. When I first saw it, I freaked. I love GOG and would have been very disappointed to see them close up shop. I like and use Impulse, but I prefer GOG. However, in my opinion, it was poor PR on their part. Imagine if you were a current customer of theirs and visited their website over the weekend? Not everyone follows gaming news

man their European. Man im always hoping for more independent American developers to succeed

had to shut down D3d on my SW b/c of ATI update. What did D3D do to the game besides zoom?

ya i told my friend to go buy the game. 2 months later FREE ONLINE game with FREE campaign. No sign of the expansion pack factions. Im sure they will come though.

[quote who="coreimpulse" reply="58" id="2782105"]I wont be buying from them again when they relaunch. I'll just get the games i already bought and go somewhere else.[/quote] alot of GOG fans have this attitude. I for one im no fan of GOG after what they did. Better be a huge apology in the form of a big discount.

[quote who="lbgsloan" reply="5" id="2781703"]Now that I read the whole post, I noticed now that he claims single player in COHO; which it does NOT have. It is multiplayer only.[/quote] no singleplayer campaign is there to play for free too

The only appeal i see for AOW 1 is that you can totally customize your wizard with any skill in the game. But i didnt like how how the window was cluttered with giant buttons or the main movement view is about 1/3 the size of the screen. SM graphics blow AOW1 away. But it seems that alot of the mechanics in AOW1 made it all the way to SM. And i love the mechanics of AOW. So props to that. I played SM for about 10 hours. And AOW for about 20 mins. So its a bit unfair. A

Im a COH fan. To me its the best RTS out there. The idea that 4 well placed guys can hold off 12 guys is something rare in RTS. Im in the open beta as well, and im loving the XP and leveling system. Its maybe too addicting. "Oh if i gain a level, i can invest points into my rangers" I love the idea of skills and perks being permanent. Actually wish WC3 did this, since i havent played that game in years. And i think adding permanent levelin

This is interesting. Maintaining this website and traffic surely cant be too expensive. And i think that they only paid these run down developing companies commission from gog sales. And I know that a lot of people did spend a good amount of money buying games. Basically revenue was good and costs were low. So something is weird.Most likely they made enough money but they sold out to someone else. But sometimes you do see Pirate Bay have the GOG version. So I guess DRM for sur

lol. you guys and furries

Stardock should hire Ice Crown..... not joking