[quote who="SpardaSon21" reply="341" id="2960677"]You'll be banding together to wage a war on death gem dust?[/quote] We try to avoid morally judging those that choose alternate lifestyles but it is a possibility if provoked ofcourse. It's always sad when people can't see eye to eye on subjects that matter. Despite our differences Arcosesphale strives to be a good neigbour. [quote who="ghostwes" reply="333" id="2
It's a step up, hopefully the next expansion then! As well as water things!
The motion to ban grinded death gems, also known as death gem dust substance from harmful use on sentient beings: 1) Abysia votes: Nay (no negative effects) 2) Arcoscephale votes: Aye! 3) Caelum votes: Abstain (cannot police lower caste population orifices) 4) C'tis votes: Nay! (stoned on death gem dust, possibly a major supplier?) 5) Marverni votes: Aye! 6) Niefelheim votes: Aye!
Is it possible that not only the peasants serving the eagle kings are at risk but also their warriors, mages and perhaps even priests? Evidence shows that death gem dust addiction affects all sentient beings especially magical ones such as the beautifull people of Caelum. Can you not be persuaded to take a stand against this terrible substance, as an example for other nations of restraint and willpower?
The participating nations including Arcosesphale deeply regret the C'thissian councils decision not to participate in this treaty and is unsure how the impression arose that this motion came from the former pantokrator in the form of a law. One anonymous philosopher has suggested that the right honourable councilor in question may have been feeling paranoid as a result of previous death gem dust exposure. As a good and honourable treaty partner in other matter
To the Ulmite ambassador: The sages of Arcosesphale have the divine foresight to prevent any accidents with deathgems by their mere handling so this is not an issue for us. We will however consider your proposal on its provided merits after voting on the motion to ban death gem dust substance is finished. Can I assume that Ulm abstains in favor of its own motion? To the Niefelheimi ambassador: Lux says: "I will greatly admire
That could be discussed however the motion on the table does not ban possessing death gems, it only bans death gem dust. This vile substance is obtained by meticulously grinding death gems down to... well dust. Not to mention the process by which death gems for this form of consumption are usually produced... Are you in favor of banning this substance? You could submit a motion to ban the trade in death gems besides banning it as a grinded substance. [e dig
Because of a stunningly spot on news report by The Astral Current©® reporter-sceptic Narina Herodes several sages of Arcosesphale have advised Queen Lux to propose a motion for a global ban on grinded death gems. All of us must stand together on preventing any more groundless paranoia and violence because of these narcotics. Countless sentient lives may be affected as was demonstrated by the recent incident involving the junior&nbs
The Astral Current All the news you want just one projection away! (Now available daily for only one astral gem a year) Breaking News:</stro
The Astral Current All the news you want just one projection away! (Now available daily for only one astral gem a year) Breaking N
Good luck with the forrest fires!
The Astral Current All the news you want just one projection away! (Now available daily for only one astral gem a year) Breaking News:
The Astral Current All the news you want just one projection away! (Now available daily for only one astral gem a year) In other News:</stron
The Astral Current All the news you want just one projection away! (Now available daily for only one astral gem a year) News:
I'm pro a new map and perhaps if the patch is out we could also patch up?
You haven't been able to scout yet have you or see dominion candles or province names? How can you know you really are this close? I suspect you have been doing some under the table diplomacy! ;)
Arcosephale. Is this the same game as is hosted on Lamaserver or are there different games now? It is confusing me who is organising this. [e digicons]:S[/e] ( http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?p=778670#post778670) No CBS but the rest of the game stats are ? Strong Independents? Slow Research? I really like Cradle of Dominions map but I'm sure others are fine too.
So how many people are we at?
MA - Arco and latest CBM
www.Dom3Minions.com sounds great!
Yes a fair distance apart would be nice plus perhaps strong starting independents? That way us noobs won't be as susceptible to rushes. I'll trust whoever hosts though.
I've played some Single player and I'd like to try mulitplayer. Could I play Arco? CPB is good although I don't really know the differences between it and Vanilla.
Defintely Civilization fanboys. In the style of the old Romans they have a true disdain for anyone not as civilized as they are. (Or merely smelling differently, weiring diffrent colours)
[quote who="Nesrie" reply="134" id="2863986"] Quoting Rasael, reply 132 Have fun on the Job! (I also suspect you will quickly grow a thick skin on these forums, like the other developers) Pretty much like anyone in any business... developers aren't special in needing to deal with angry customers after all. Jon is welcome here; he knows that without your overgeneralized rant. The thread welcoming him is
[quote]Oh and don't get bogged down in petty things like the "Truth" or "Facts" I am looking for the more positive side of our little elemental community to shine through.[/quote] It's amazing how people can get around justifying their negative responses in a topic dedicated to positively welcoming Jon. It is the very apex of anti social behavior and lack of maturity to post spoiling replies in a topic dedicated to welcoming someone in a warm manner. How much w