FlyGuy

"You either didn't read that whole thread, didn't understand it, or are intentionally quoting him out of context." I'll remove that then. No it's not language barrier that was just something that I had quoted. There he called Horses stupid, ordinary mounts and promoted Bears. Well, that some people like horses should come to mind. If a Horse is stupid, a Bear is no more IMO. The whole Bear was arbitrary and you guys are trying to elevate that has an official thing. Not even many playe

I just did one on Paint. Its just one of them. Paticipe if you want to, do not need to be skilled or anything. Edit2 http://i35.tinypic.com/icmkjb.jpg Edit3 http://i42.tinypic.com/28r1mig.jpg Edit5 [IMG]http://i40.tinypic.com/b98u9u.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i44.tinypic.com/nzez51.jpg[/IMG] Edit6 [IMG]http://i42.tinypic.com/2hx67g3.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i42.tinypic.com/28b7erl.jpg[/IMG] The Bear want friends </p

You see? Not only Bears can look cool. The armor is also very nice.

Space Ponies since it was not an arbitrary thing created by egocentric guys. It was more genuine and creative.

Official because you both have been making it to be. First of all there should not be this horse excluding thing, is it because Luckmann-want-it-all dislikes it?. There are horses, unicorns, then bears, panda or so, boars, bipede bird, giant cats(felines), the creature shouldn't really matter, but a big participation do. "Luckmann[bears] mittens, can't you go on the forums and tell FlyGuy7 to stuff it? :| 17:29 mittens I'm no

[IMG]http://www.mariowiki.com/images/thumb/d/db/FlyGuysMP8.png/200px-FlyGuysMP8.png[/IMG] I like my army of masked helicopter headed little guys. Thank you very much. [e digicons]k1[/e] They look pacific. @ landisaurus Don't worry, I just felt pressured by it has I'm also going to buy the game. What I said is r

You please remember Mr. FrogBoy, that when younger, you were a nice quiet little guy that never could bare all the noise...

Anyway I ended. I'm not even wishing I could vote for anything, but point to never incentive the worse manners, look for what is fairer at least and never prejudicy or give less valor to those that have reasonable behavior but because of this won't appear to much and be spamming around. Still they are faithful too and are there. That should never happen.

[quote]If you don't want to see something in the game, then give a reason why having it would detract from the game. If you can't come up with anything, then sit down and be quiet...[/quote] Don't you get it? I valorize that they take idea from players if they are good or fit, just that it should be from a poll from the hugest number of players possible and not the ones that speak more. I'm just passing it has I don't think it would be fair and even a wrong route to take since th

You won't have any luck trying to flame me. If you weren't so dam loud that even you know it's true, you wouldn't feel the need to go after things has "F*CK YOU" has I wasn't aggressive to you or even wanted to make references in the post. Also is contraditory you to be telling me to grow up when you make a post like that. I'm pointing something I see has wrong and would not feel confortable about in a "company material"-player way if players could be attended to their wishes using of

[quote who="Wintersong" reply="3" id="1964102"]I think that he just fears that one element of the game will be decided just because of some loud people. Not per se bad (the decission of that game element, i mean), but a problem if that element is not truly good for the game. The spirit of the first post is good but not having heard from Stardock about it, not sure there should be too much to worry about bear cavalry, frog cavalry or pokemons. They will decide if bear cavalry must be in the ga

[quote who="Vandenburg" reply="1" id="1964091"] And speaking of pretentious: Isn't it pretentious to just make a thread to protest against something other people talk about and then even to petition the devs not to listen to them? [/quote] How is that it? If you say I'm pretentious to believe they would take it, yes I think it could happen since some players joined that, and I don't think it would be fair just because some have the time and are unbounded to keep spreading it. I'

I almost stand up against Bear cavalry in this game. Personaly, I have no dissafection for anyone that want it but I have for the way that was used to propose it. When I saw this suggestion for the first time it seemed to me one like many others like it should be; or should it be better called just a wish since it does not aim for the game desenvolment? But anyway, I thought that was just ok. It's ok that someone create a topic and puts on the title: "Please, have chocobos in this gam

[quote who="Vandenburg" reply="12" id="1961637"] Imagine the AI with something like AIML. A help request would then probably sound like this: Human: I said attack him ALICE: Are you serious? What did you mean by it? What's your favorite movie? Human: attacking, not movies ALICE: I've never seen it. I would like to see it. Human: that's not a movie ALICE: Please correct my mistake. What is a movie ? Human: ca

Thats a nice initiative. I like the idea to have both Player and AI in matchs (I often did that when playing some games) because its fun to see the AI interfering. Simply because, the AI do not have friend preferences (unless you are going to ingrate it) so you need to win his grace towards you somehow; and also do not have preferences to whom to atack in most games, so its just fun to see it interfering. There really are good things about AIs that a human player can not substitute. B

Double post sorry. [e digicons]X|[/e]

[quote]Thanks for the last Screenshot of the battle scene...[/quote] No problem [quote]that does look interesting, though I am wondering whether the battles now will become something similar to the chess match on the Millennium Falcon. Moving forces in a chess like manner, for them to fight it out when paths cross...[/quote] Don't know about that too. I'm used to chess battles from most board strategy games (except Total War I think), but I'm tranquil that E:WoM will h

Its not the say Stardock wouldn't do a great job with more realistic graphics, has they did it with Sins and DemiGod. What gives Elemental the cartoon graphics appearence, is the 2d feel (has if it was draw; the contours arround everything) and the colored graphics. But there is a painting feel to it that breaks it; the mountains, the ground/grass, the ocean waves and the bird here: https://www.elementalgame.com/Screenshots/Kingdom_Scott_City_1280.jpg A game like King's bounty, is a g

[quote]Flyguy please, I have informed you I dont read your posts....to save you any further effort or wasted time I advise you to stop posting concerning me. The thread has evolved beyond your 'Respect us theme' and all parties involved have agreed to disagree on the subject of E:WoM art, but on some subjects we are very much of the same mind. Move on![/quote] Without offence, really, I d

To dissent is good, but even to dissent, like with everything else, you must be reasonable. If you choose to dissent about something related to a community, take the community in mind and how that is better for most, don't put personal whishes above it. In some cases, it is also important to show consideration to the other side and not anule it or show disrespect for it. Instead of proposing a graphical revamp, why not propose a middle term that probably most can be fine with?

[quote who="Anomander" reply="3" id="1957685"] Quoting FlyGuy7, reply 11(not my foult if you feel gay from that, because I don't /jk ) Flyguy I never read any of your posts beyond your first opening paragraph. I assumed you where immature for making the discussion personal! [/quote] That wasn't direct to you, that was a universal jk (even I was in it, since if I told that, I obsviusly had to take notice of it first). English is not my first language, I

This game will follow the lines of MOM and others alike, not Colonization. Map is bigger and exploration is more emphased. And I think you guys distorted what TC was proposing, that was a big gameplay change. Something has turning one animal into another (or converting tiles) is unlogical, not fun and hurts exploration. If you only want a specific resource, probably you can because it seems there will be a Bestiary to set the creatures. Or easy yet, if you just want to stick with some

I and many tried to show you reasons to like it, so for you better enjoy it or see any good side of it. But you didn't accepted any argument, not even that the graphics are still in work (you just want something else and thats it). If you give your thoughts in a forum, especially being contraditory over something and calling the attention over you, should be because you need opinions or you want to change their mind (they will not change the graphics totaly at this point, even you know that),

Ok thanks, I edited it to explain better.

Did Stardock at least pronounced about mounts? Like how they envision it? I like that players can give suggestions and all, but I also would like to know their suggestion first. You guys know that esay like: Do not bother the artist, or something? (I'm making it) I know this is a suggestion section, but I mean about hearing what they have to say first and how they envision before anything. I have a suggestion about players and they prefered mounts, but I don't even know what they think about