[quote who="-RAISTLIN-" reply="708" id="2504278"]lol. Quoting TheDarkKnight2008, reply 704 Quoting -RAISTLIN-, reply 702 Quoting Frogboy, reply 700 Fortunately for you, people have resisted the instinctive urge to let "the wise people" decide for the rest of us. I'm sorry that you find the CO2 AGW hypothesis so complex. But just because you think it's complicated doesn't mean everyone
[quote who="-RAISTLIN-" reply="702" id="2504243"] Quoting Frogboy, reply 700 Fortunately for you, people have resisted the instinctive urge to let "the wise people" decide for the rest of us. I'm sorry that you find the CO2 AGW hypothesis so complex. But just because you think it's complicated doesn't mean everyone else does. I believe in evolution through natural selection. I don't need a biology degree to understand the mechanics
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1242011/DAVID-ROSE-The-mini-ice-age-starts-here.html One of the top IPCC guys who was pushing global warming on everyone is now predicting a cooling period of 2-3 decades. Oh look, 3d tv AND global cooling coming back! AND LEDS! The 70's have returned! Now lets see if the sheeple will a
[quote who="-RAISTLIN-" reply="694" id="2504092"] Quoting TheDarkKnight2008, reply 690 People like you are the types who kept the victorian era going and burned scientists at the stake. yeah, because im the one in here arrogant enough to think i know better than the world's leading experts on a particularly complex issue. the deniers are the ones akin to burning scientists you fool- im the one advocating that we listen to them. [/q
[quote who="Campaigner" reply="692" id="2504087"]The so called leaders of the world gathered in Copenhagen and wasted 4 days talking about whos time it was to talk, why country x was allowed to talk before country y and such.... We've had -14 C here in Sweden so this global warming thing I will believe when I see solid proof. In the meantime I'll side with the skeptics. Interesting the theory that the sun have been ignored as cause of our temperature.... <br
[quote who="-RAISTLIN-" reply="672" id="2503226"] Quoting Daiwa, reply 671 We're all qualified to be sceptical, Raistlin, whether you like it or not. Not really, only people with the requisite knowledge are qualified to be “sceptical” in this field. Those that do not possess such expertise are just armchair quarterbacks. True scepticism hinges upon evidence; ie if a certain amount of evidence supports a position
[quote who="tetleytea" reply="655" id="2501293"]LOL we as gamers can't even agree we are all gamers. Funny thing about these "deep freeze" news stories is, they are talking about how we're getting our coldest temperatures since 1996, 1999, etc.. St. Louis has its first sub-zero temperature since 1999. I remember bicycling to school growing up in negative temperatures--in Missouri, in the daytime. We played outdoor hockey (well...more like broomb
[quote who="Fuzzy Logic" reply="653" id="2501252"] OH NO! That nasty man made global warming is rearing it;s ugly head all over the us and europe! The current cold weather here is nothing to do with global warming:- http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/richardblack/2010/01/arctic_conditions_arctic_cause.html I'm glad that as gamers we can all agree on something as a community... Why do you assume we are all gamers? [/quote]
OH NO! That nasty man made global warming is rearing it;s ugly head all over the us and europe! http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100108/ap_on_re_us/us_winter_weather http://www.kwtx.com/weather/headlines/80707332.html http://www.halifaxc
Stardock Forums
Hey, I can't get fences to create when right clicking in windows 7 64 bit. I guess support hasn't been added yet, but I wanted to say this. Also, it would be nice if individual fences could have their icons resized (In other words, each window having all icons in it the same size, but each window can change the sizes of all icons in it, and other windows can be different sizes). I'm speaking from what I plan to do with fences, but I would imagine it would help. One
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="277" id="2472796"] According to GW alarmists we are the problem. I'm a regular on Treehugger.com and one of the most popular topics is how do we, as a species encourage either our gradual extinction or at the very least, a massive decline in our population to help "the environment". At various times in our planet's history, there have been species that have "polluted" far more than humans have. It's worth pointing out that the free
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6736517/Copenhagen-climate-summit-1200-limos-140-private-planes-and-caviar-wedges.html The governments that are going to the summit on 'climate change' believe in using less energy SO MUCH that they are going to burn as much energy as a large city. T
[quote who="Fuzzy Logic" reply="127" id="2465980"]Rather than use others' data to determine if the climate is warming, I can use my own. I've been keeping weather records since 1976. Taking the average temperature of the winter months of Dec, Jan and Feb for the first 15 years as being zero, the period 1993-2007 was 0.89°C warmer. Although 15 years is not long enough to indicate any kind on long term climate change, the increase is significant. I also ahve records on
[quote who="lifekatana" reply="103" id="2465464"]lol. If there is presented overwhelming evidence to you backed with overwhelming scientific support, would you not accept it? One little -religious- scientist with a certificate of some backwater college schooled in geology working for some institute funded by exxon mobile who comes up with (faulty) evidence against global warming does not mean global warming is not true. They're scientists who don't believe in heisenbergs uncertainty principle
Another thing that should be mentioned is that a person of a scientific mindset would use the scientific method for anything. This entire topic is a theory. A theory on rather or not global warming is happening. This theory should be questioned with the scientific method just like any theories. 1. Consider the problem and try to make sense of it using your experience. 2. State an explanation if no explanation is known. 3.&
1. Einstein's theory of relativity fundamentally altered what scientists once agreed to from Euclidean's 'space' to spacetime. So did the discoveries of many other scientists. Science isn't always right. 2. The entire purpose of science is to question reality. Without science questioning reality, we'd have people still believing the world is flat (Which ironically seems to be the same type of argument these global warming believers say). Science by d
Stardock Forums
As usual though, I expect idiots like you to go cry to mods, because that's what people do who start something with others. This was a speculation thread, then you start acting like your word is factual IN A SPECULATION THREAD.
Stardock Forums
Once again whatever. Their IS NO SALES REPORTED YET DUMBASS, and alot of games can sell out the first week, and stil sell bad. Why don't you go back to have orgasms with Madden 09 and shut the **** up before sales arrive?
Stardock Forums
(I'm very sorry, I can't edit for some reason) This ring a bell? Diakatana was anticipated to sell alot too.
Stardock Forums
Just to clarify, this was the most anticipated pc game for the past few years, now being outsold by... the wii wheel. It doesn't matter what the developer anticipated, it matters what the consumers say and do. Try understanding that and being less of an idiot.
Stardock Forums
Any game that drops to #9 from #1 in it's launch week has no chance in hell of selling 2 million much less 500,000. If your too stupid too figure that one out, then nothing I can say will do anything else for ya.
Stardock Forums
Yeah whatever. Seen the latest pirated numbers?
I could imagine 2 of them in a 3d fps... One for wasd and one for regular mouse......
Stardock Forums
No question now. Spore is in freefall.