Blizz said WD doesn't replace Necro but then their promises are rather vague... as is their support for stuff. And concerning Barbarian, i forgot to mention i meant the skills. Didn't Blizzard say that the skills are redone?
Blizzard isn't an inventive game desingner anymore. They just refine even they say that they follow Sid Meier's rule (1/3 of each: old, improved and new) Still D3 looks good and gory (something wow lacks) Trying to buy D2 here but for some reason i cant get Blizzard store account working. Contacted support but no idea when i get an answer. Barbarian seems to be based on WC3 Tauren Chieftain and Wow's warrior. Witch doctor? Duh, no idea were they got the ideas. Any guesse
cheers!
It should show habitable planets and unhabitable ones.
The AI's ok with the diplomacy, but could be better of course. The real problem is that the diplomacy system is far too limited and it's more like trading. I want more Civ-series styled diplomacy (yeah GC is different from SMcivs but anyway) Oh and the AI is not active enough when it comes to dealing with the player.
Oh thank the [insert something here].
Hopefully we'll get more info (and in depth) about the different editors.
GalCiv2 Forums
Yeah, aligment affects race's behaviour but that doesn't stop them backstabbing or declaring war against you if they've decided to have conquest victory or so.
Question about Tech Tree editor: Does it allow one to make COMPLETLY new tech trees or just edit the old ones?
IMO Death Beam is good name. But if you insist changing the name then... Deaf Beam!
Micromanagement? Well there is no 4x or any TBS without micromanaging but i agree that planet governors should be added to the game.
It's sad if TA is last exp. GC2 is a great game and they should continue it. I mean GC3 takes years, and personally, i'm not really interested buy every new game in the series (Don't have GC1, never going to buy/rent etc.), i'd rather see more exp packs. Cheaper, devs can concentrate to smaller amount of content so it's better, and new stuff overall is fun.
Wait a second. Second and last exp pack? Wasn't there a dev journal thread about possible future exp packs and how radical they should be? So will we get more or not? I mean DA was good, TA is even better, so why not make even more better one?
We already get a new victory condition but i wish we'd get one more. Economy victory. Could be based on how much trade/tourism etc. income you get or when you reach certain amount of money (500k?) and keep it there for 10 weeks.
waah? Cool ad.
Should be this: Debug Message: Version v1.80f Twilight of the Arnor beta 3b last updated on: Thu Dec 6 11:50:39 2007 Debug Message: Checking DX Version. Debug Message: *********DXDiag info follows.********* System Info Time: 12/15/2007, 14:03:04 DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904) Machine Name: P-309FA8D63FD34 Operating System: Windows XP Home Edition (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 2 (2600.xpsp_sp2_gdr.070227-2254) Languages: Finnish (Regio
Hello. I just installed this game again, as i never played it through. I remember that the multiplayer was fun. But now i'm asking, does anyone play SCPT's MP anymore or can it even played anymore? And if it's possible, is there anyone willing to play it?
The AI. It would be stupid.
I this downloadable right now? Can't see it in SDC
I'm not sure whether it's the game or my PC but every time a new pop-up comes or i open a planet, i hear static and there is a slight FPS drop. I don't think the static was in DA and overall the TA UI feels a bit slow. Is it memorry inefficient? I have exactly same settings as in DA.
Why don't other civ's react to a Terror Star? In Civilization and SMAC others declare war to you if you use a nuke/planet buster or are afraid of you or so. I think AI should be mistrustful if the player or an other AI [b] BEGINS [/b] to build a Terror Star and make demands to stop that or so. And what about the UP banning the TS's? Or increasing the build limit?
Yeah i know, integarted are horrible. But the new computer isn't that important, and as i said, i can play Galciv2 fine, as long as i don't play the bigger maps. Loading times are too long then and anyway i like playing on smaller maps as the AI is better.
Hmm... As well as DA? Well i just bought it. My specs are within recommended except my video card is DX8 (Radeon 9200), whicg is reason for low performance when there is much stuff on screen but i mostly use iconic view anyway so no matter. New computer is on shopping list. Thanks for answer. PS Merry Xmas
One more question: What are TA's recommendend specs?
Hull type or module that provides "range" would simulate a carrier nicely in this game. As long as it would only create the for small and tiny ships because adding life support to those takes away other options.