Stmorpheus

Stmorpheus

Joined Member # 1776303
52 Posts 535 Replies 563 Reputation

As it stands tactical battles are much better than they were in WOM, but they still need some improvement. I really like the initiative system, and the new abilities. these give us some tactical options, but there are a few things things that i think would make it go along way to being better. 1: Most importantly; the battles need attack of opportunities. this is vital in how you set up your attac

36 Replies 18,964 Views

so far i am really enjoying the beta, but some suggestions i would make are this. 1: since Fallen Enchantress no longer uses the dynasty system i think the passage of time should change from each turn being a season to each turn being a day. to me this makes more sense and would allow for #2. 2: if each turn were a day then seasonal changes could have

2 Replies 3,364 Views

i agree about the heroes being too powerful to soon. i vote for a level progression thats 1/4 slower than it is currently and increasing the rarity of the more powerful items.

146 Replies 70,492 Views

[quote who="Edwin99" reply="72" id="3059130"] Issue 01: New units appear outside of the city. In may case each time I train a unit they are killed by the monsters that await outside the city.[/quote] actually i think there is an option that you can toggle that spawns them inside the city.

103 Replies 215,090 Views

wow after reading that i think you may have actually pulled off having your cake and eating it too. so excited to give the beta a try. i love how you can customize as much as you want, but at the same time if you want to just play a game without spending all that time thinking stuff up you can still have a great experience. that's some excellent game design, kudos!

110 Replies 310,631 Views

actually i think i am glad that the tactical maps aren't generated on the fly. it assures me that they will prob all be pretty good, my only concern is will there be enough so as to avoid "arrow to the knee" syndrome.

44 Replies 99,737 Views

this is cool and all, but i worry that the game will just be about teching up to a more powerful weapon. i understand that this is gonna happen to a certain degree, but i was really wanting the weapons to have different strategic uses. an example would be daggers. i don't want daggers to just go away because you got swords now. i want a reason to have daggers over swords. maybe a bump in speed or dodge or something. maybe

83 Replies 206,225 Views

yeah i think it would be cool if a group of monsters from a lair attack a town and if they destroy it, it becomes ruins and hence another lair! this way monsters could even take the world back over if they get lucky to get that one outskirt town that you didn't defend very well.

52 Replies 217,826 Views

thanks brad, that was a fantastic response. it really is an unfortunate situation with the personnel issue. i hope that you guys can find some talented people that you need.

36 Replies 25,404 Views

i understand that things turn out the way they do. i don't have any real hard feelings about it, but its just that i haven't heard anything new about multiplayer in quite some time. i guess i just want to know if you guys are still working on it or have put off development of it. i check the change logs and i haven't seen anything in there regarding multiplayer in a while. since 1.3 will be game changes will that include mult

36 Replies 25,404 Views

all you can do is post your saves, dump files, direct x information etc. in the support forums and hope for the best.

8 Replies 5,082 Views

yeah we all had high hopes for multiplayer. only stardock knows at this point the plans they have for it. maybe they want it to fade from memory, or maybe they have bigger plans. i wish someone would just post the plans they have, like it or not. its the speculation that's driving me crazy.

36 Replies 25,404 Views

[quote who="Frogboy" reply="13" id="2929473"]The requirement for FE is that it must be awesome. That will determine the release date on it. It is substantially different from WOM though. So far, quite a bit more like MOM than WOM was. [/quote] [e digicons]:drool:[/e]

72 Replies 32,860 Views

[quote who="Femmefatal48" reply="10" id="2930605"]They should just take out MP altogether. Nobody really plays it and it's just a waste of resources to include it in these types of games. Put those resources and time spent programming MP into the single player AI you promised you wouldn't take away from time on the single player game for multiplayer anyways Brad. So just can MP and let's get on with a great single player experience. [/quote] <span style="font-size: small;"

20 Replies 77,256 Views

[quote who="Derek Paxton" reply="50" id="2929983"] Quoting Kadrium, reply 46Derek, one thing I'm concerned about is tech research being a bit to automated. If the entire tree is visible from the start, it seems like it would compel the player to look down to the end of the trees, pick the end game tech they most want, and let the auto-pathing handle it from there on out. The system actually seems to discourage you from changing research strategies mid game, as there will be no surpri

153 Replies 607,440 Views

yeah, i am loving this approach. as long as you keep the random techs i am all for it. one of the most important replayability factors for me is for each game to have something new and different. also it seems like i am gonna be spending more time researching tech. the one thing i dislike about the current game is that you research everything way to fast. i like having something to research throughout the whole game no matter how m

153 Replies 607,440 Views