First, i don't complain, i try to explain...
I didn't call you a complainer. If you're pointing out that something isn't right, that is a textbook complaint. You're not whining about it or trying to shout or anything and I made no insinuation of the sort, just referred to your post as exactly what it is, a complaint. Its not considered a bad thing. If I said argument instead of complaint, even though a point that differs from another in an exchange is considered an argument would you still come back here and say I don't argue, I try to explain...?
I mean, I'm not fighting or yelling or trying to be insulting like usual, just explaining things too, but my counterpoints can all be called arguments none the less, that's just the nature of the English language.
Second, you will only find a receive time from mail server... it is how e-mail header work... SENT is not a header
And that is exactly my point. SENT times are not recorded into the headers because the email is gone from where it was sent from and there is nothing to record those times to at that point. So you cannot claim that a received time is the sent time. Its just as I said, not true. Most times, things work out so that the sent and received times are very close together, but as I pointed out in my last post, there are times when things get 'lost' in transit and take much longer to arrive. Your header proves only that you got the email late, not that it was sent late. That was my argument. Feel free to disprove it.
