If you really believe that “Man is not capable of truth” … I don’t think this is exactly what you wanted to say … but I’d say you are in a bad way.
I mean exactly what I said. And no, I am not in any "bad" way. I simply know the limits of human comprehension.
Remember 500 years ago how the world was flat, and everyone "knew" it was? But I digress....
Just think of what we could really do if the neo-politicians stopped pretending to oppose each other on non-political issues like...
4 The constitution,
6 Peace (???),
7 Human rights,
8 Civil rights,
9 God given rights,
10 Sexual divergences,
11 Green whatever,
13 Immigration reform,
14 Border control,
15 Energy restrictions,
16 Developing our own resources, etc.
Ok, lets look at this list then, and see what I see here.
1 - stands for what?
2 - morality, what does one stand for? If you can't defend the innocent and unborn you have no business procreating.
3 - not going there....
4 - If you can not live under a countries founding documents, then you should leave that country for one that you agree with.
5,6 - war and peace are simple conflict resolutions
7 - what rights do you want to have? what rights will you give up? and who decides? Do you really want to go there?
8 - same as above
9 - still same as above
10 - the problem is in the definition.... going against the natural order of things is obviously a problem.
11 - slime? I suppose it is good to be responsible with what we have, isn't it?
12 - I have none, just experience.
13 - A country without any law will degrade into lawlessness
14 - same as above
15 - politics should not influence the free market, period.
16 - same as above
I don't see how protecting a nations people is non-political. I don't see how having law to protect the people i non-political. I don't see how providing a free market for productivity to thrive is non-political.
And I don't see how you can be taken seriously when you make these obviously flawed statements.
"Prejudices are what fools use for reason." - Voltaire