Viewing a shuttle in orbit with such clarity is no mean feat and being able to 'see' in real time over even that small an area has got to be a boon. Especially for those on the front lines. Not necessarily in combat though. Think of the advantage during disasters like the one in Japan a couple of weeks ago or the earthquake in New Zealand. Not to mention the possibility of one or more of the active volcanoes erupting. Imagine having one of those monitoring a fault zone recording an earthquake as it happens in real time and if its out at sea being able to track a tsunami and provide advanced warning to those in harms way.

What the Air Force is doing isn't really all that original:

"SETI@home
SETI@home is the program and the project that involves millions of at home users from around the world in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI). Since 1999, volunteers have been able to recycle their unused computing cycles in helping to analyze data collected from radio telescopes in search of signals from other worlds. This unprecedented network of over 5 million independent SETI@home volunteers constitutes the world’s largest supercomputer."

I actually worked on something similar over the summer at a two-week-long advanced computer science program. Some elements in the Ohio Supercomputer Center's GLENN mainframe use similar technology, but I think there are PS2 processors instead of PS3 (largely because PS3s weren't around when that portion of the computer was added). They use it for large scientific simulations and bulk image processing- the application I saw hunted for comets in telescope pictures. It's not particularly new technology.

This would truly be a great boon to many fields. Sadly, I'll bet it won't be long until the governments of the world start turning this kind of surveillance against it's own people en'mass. Right now, London England is the most heavily watched city in the world, followed by either New York or Paris, not sure which, but one of those two is in second place. Of course this kind of surveillance has it's advantages, like seeing a car accident and knowing who was truly at fault when the case goes to court, but, some people in London are currently trying to fight the system because they say it's a blatant invasion of their privacy.

I remember seeing a video a while back where a guy in London played a joke on local law enforcement by dressing up as an alien and pretending to "invade" the town to see how long it would take the cops to notice what was going on with their video surveillance and get to the scene. The reason he did it and is against the video surveillance is because he's proven that one of the street cameras sees Directly Into His Window when they pan the camera in his direction. If I was him I'd be pissed too and I'd definitely want the camera, at least that particular camera, removed.

Sorry. No can do. Belongs to Google.

It would be great if normal people (or a hacker) could take control of the cameras and record stuff themselves. Think about it Raven!   It would be like "Big Brother: RavenX edition"

There is a link to another story here in this post  ->https://forums.stardock.com/374820

LoL that would be cool

I think what I'd do though is aim the camera at a women's rest room or shower door or something, then blame the cops for doing it, then call all the local TV stations. That should put a stop to all this "City Surveillance" non-sense.

If memory serves there was an app out there about a year or so ago that you could dl and install on your PC that could do just that. But nowadays I doubt I could remember where or when.

You know, that's actually a Really Good Question. You can get a motherboard and processor chip that's far more powerful than a PS3 for less than half the cost. This leads me to believe there must be some kind of "non-obvious" advantage to using the PS3 set-up over a traditional processor.

The system I'm familiar with used the graphics elements of the PS2s only, as well as a whole stack of commercial NVidia graphics cards for separate applications.