[quote who="Gwenio1" reply="154" id="2917157"] I am not in the Steam hating group, but I do not use it. For me it is mostly that I found Impulse to be a better client, as Steam annoyed me. And they have lost my account since I stopped playing the one game I had from them.[/quote] Impulse client is pretty crappy, actually. It's "better" just in the sense that's optional and you don't have to run it to play a game, after the first installation... but when it comes to co
TucoBenedicto
Try Gothic 2 Gold and Risen. Or Vampire: Bloodlines.
[quote who="coreimpulse" reply="222" id="2888797"] Wow, some big dissapointments there, like Rage and brink. I think by now I should rename the title of my original article to Steam : A monopoly.[/quote] Except it isn't. Also, may The Pink Unicorn bless Steam every given day if the alternative is GFWL or Gamespy.
[quote who="Campaigner" reply="16" id="2887622"]Am I the only one who have never been into battlefield? This feels like one of the big gameseries that "everybody" has to play but I've never been interested in it.[/quote] Your loss, it's just the most impressive, compelling and deep multiplayer FPS out there.
[quote who="ZehDon" reply="15" id="2833806"] If you have nothing against Steamworks then you don't know enough about the history of the PC Software Industry. [/quote] OR: I just know it's a very good service. Which in fact I do. [quote]Add Impulse::Reactor is a viable alternative to developers that doesn't shackle their game to Impulse. Steamworks turns anyone else who sells the game into a Valve re-seller.[/quote] Impulse Reactor so far it's just a fairy ta
Steam has very FEW exclusive titles. What you people are ranting about, mostly, are titles with Steamworks integrated, which is a very different topic. Beside, I really can't say I have nothing against Steamworks. It works great and it's available for developers, which Impulse Reactor is not.
[quote who="OMG_blackmage" reply="7" id="2833550"]hmm so they whine when they chose to stop selling pc games themselves?[/quote] Pretty much.
[quote who="Annatar11" reply="1" id="2833465"]Dark grey on black background is incredibly hard to read [/quote] Not really my fault if this forum sucks so bad handling copy&paste. No idea about how to set neutral text, if I set it as white it's unreadable on Impulse forum, if I set it black it's going to be unreadable on Elemental forum, and so on... By the way, there's a goddamn link to the original text in the first raw. Just click on it.
http://www.mcvuk.com/features/808/OPINION-Retail-vs-Steam I ha
[quote who="ZehDon" reply="29" id="2830629"] Quoting Lord Xia, reply 28Hey, people are allowed to have their own opinion, even if it seems like bat-shit crazy hyperbole. I personally would take a Bethesda, Bioware, or Obsidian game over just about any other developer, including Stardock. I don't even know who did the Witcher, I've been meaning to pick it up, it looks good and all, when it gets really cheap, I might pick it up. Granted, however there's a difference betwee
No one is saying all games are wonderful. Anyway, sure they aren't good or bad cause of a choice about their art style. Honestly it's not our fault if you keep making stupid, shallow statements which are mostly untrue.
[quote who="Nack210" reply="16" id="2767589"]Nah, the style Elemental has isn't cartoony. They don't have huge sized shoulderpads like in WoW, or exaggerated anatomy like in other MMOs, or Fable. Seriously, they look pretty normal to me: [/quote] Actually they look pretty BAD. Elemental has the most generic, unispired, dull art direction I can remember in a while. Not that gameplay was any better, anyway. You can even
Yes, I remeber many bugged games. Never been a big deal for me. Despise common whines about this topic, I think bugs are a way too overrated issue. Many of my all-time favourites were bugged as hell at launch (Ultima saga, X-COM, Fallout, Baldur's Gate, Darklands, Mount & Blade, Space Rangers 2, Battlefield 2, Jagged Alliance, etc) but they still amazing games. I have much more difficulty to for
[quote who="scratchthepitch" reply="68" id="2809192"] On the now locked thread about steam here, you were one of the strongest promoters of this monopoly scam. And here you are using bs to defend steam's main salesboi here and attacking those he attacked. Gee, that's some real curious coincidence, aint it. [/quote] God, you're creepy. You're actually paranoid in an almost-scary way.
I simply don't. i don't like it at all. There isn't one single feature which makes this game better than Master of Magic or Age of Wonders 2. So its very existence is mostly meaningless.
[quote who="John_Hughes" reply="7" id="2730167"] "is that it’s broken to the point of being unplayable" It is BS statements like that one that assure me that site is F'ed beyond repair. I am and have been playing E:WoM and having a good time doing so. [/quote] Actually to me E:WoM is almost unplayable, so I really can't see this statement as a bullshit.
[quote who="Wintersong" reply="7" id="2699186"]. Steamworks means that the game, even if it's released in physical, requires you to be connected constantly to Steam to be able to play. Just that.[/quote]Steamworks means that the game integrates all the awesome Steam's community features.
It runs BAD. I have a mediocre Intel E6550 with 2 GB RAM and two 8800 GTS in SLI. Well, I can barely run the game in 1680x1050 with AA turned off, experiencing some framerate drop and heavy loading times. With AA on, even just at 2X, framerate drops are huge.
[quote who="4Nana" reply="2" id="2700542"]guess those people who are boycotting civ 5 because of w/e better not go to Maryland ever. You gotta teach Maryland a lesson that it's not ok to support Sid![/quote] This made me laugh pretty hard. :D
I'm so disappointed with this game so far...
[quote] I personally feel vendor-neutral solutions like Impulse::Reactor[/quote] Right, that very Impulse Reactor not yet available for developers/publishers.
From Rock, Paper, Shotgun: [QUOTE][B]Jim[/B]:: Yes, it’s very much in that school of Oh-This-Is-Aliens-From-A-Top-Down-Perspective [B]John[/B]:: But unlike Shadowgrounds and others, this is four-player co-op. And without four, it’s not really worth trying. [B]Jim[/B]:: And, sadly for Team 17, it makes Alien Breed Evolution look a bit stiff and uninspired. Which is a shame, because that’s a fairly entertaining game. [B]John[/B]:: Yes. [i]Valve making
[quote who="Island Dog" reply="4" id="2690251"]Getting mine from Amazon. Mafia II[/quote] So, your point is to buy PS3 version just to fuck Steam? Not supporting "endangered" PC gaming and encouraging console mass market . Far worse "sin" than buying something with Steamworks integration for me, to be honest. Also, I'm totally fine with Steam. They have probably the best service today available on PC. I hate much more fiercely GFWL, which you guys seem love
Now I'm really looking for the tactical combat beta. I must admit that battles with autoresolve really keep me from enjoying the gameplay.
I really didn't like Fallout 3 so New Vegas was a "no go" from the start for me. Neverthless, I can't really say I have nothing at all against Steamworks. It sure is ten times better than that huge pile of crap called GFWL. Said that, I was wondering if Stardock, D2D, Gamersgate, etc.. have at least tried to reach an agreement with Valve , about making Steamworks some sort of shared standard, extended to the competing pl