[quote who="Alxander" reply="50" id="2756597"]Well I guess Stardock's best game is a 4.0. Such an amazing developer [/quote] Since when did Gamespot become the place to take reviews from?
[quote who="solidsmooky" reply="52" id="2756432"]Wow, firing some of your employees while you're on vacation. Haha, thats cold as hell, man. [/quote] I think yuo are a waste of the oxygen you breathe, man your parents failed in teaching you how to be a human being.
So we just going to keep making threads saying the same thing ver and over again or are we going to start looking at ways to fix it??
[quote who="surlybob" reply="126" id="2755598"] Quoting kryo, reply 116 Piracy is not a victimless act. Like misrepresenting a public beta as a completed game? Oh, forgot. It's only bad when consumers ripoff corporations. Its good old free market capitalism when corporations ripoff consumers. Ah ha. Is this REALLY the proper time to be grinding that particular axe? Right after you do the kind of release that is Exhibit A for pirates justifying piracy? <b
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="37" id="2755521"]It's pretty easy to make minor factions do more so I'll take your suggestions and do exactly that. Minor factions will focus on building one kick-arse metropolis but they won't expand. [/quote] Let them expand if they can, but only by conqouring....god that would be cool...you wouldn't really expect it.
I would like to see minor factions be ableto spread by taking oer cities instead of having pioneers.
So does the AI use this?
[quote who="Deth2" reply="95" id="2751846"]You know what's better than getting back forum access for a company that so little values my patronage? My $50 back. Email sent, gratification incoming. [/quote] Good luck, hopefully that will solve all your problems.
These are interesting, but will the AI use them? I guess that is the question for all mods...if the AI can be modified to use them.
[quote who="Deth2" reply="90" id="2751803"]No Rune, I never felt threatened. But your "should I tell 'em what you're doing elsewhere" comes off as nothing more than one. [/quote] Listen just provide proof you bought the game and everything will be fine.
[quote who="Deth2" reply="85" id="2751788"]Please do Rune. I stand by EVERYTHING I've said on Qt3 about the screwjob I've received from Stardock, both the botched game as well as the forum BS. I really rather enjoy that someone who resorts to THREATS as you have more than once in this thread alone is free to post whereas customers with legitimate issue are not so lucky. [/quote] Heh, you honestly feel threatened? When people discuss with
[quote who="surlybob" reply="82" id="2751782"] Quoting dragoaskani, reply 79 Right, I'm about done playing nice with you. You who probably sleeps with a bib have the audacity to make jabs at me? Actually no, I won't play this game. Kryo's been busting my chops about being nice. So I just hope and pray that your children are born with sever mental and physical handicaps. And the worst (best?) thing about me is I SINCERLY mean that.Quit hiding behind Kyro. You make i
[quote who="Deth2" reply="80" id="2751777"] Quoting Rune_74, reply 78 I knowingly stir up crap? Hmmm, who's calling names here and acting like a 14 year old boy going thruugh puberty? I have commented about issues I have, perhaps if you did it in a normal functioning adult way, you would not have been banned. I was banned because I posted that I had a non-functioning game. Oh and that I dared to use a user created patch to fix som
[quote who="Deth2" reply="68" id="2751725"] Quoting Rune_74, reply 66 I saw your post on qt3....you are pretty bitter. After getting banned from the forums I've been on for nearly 10 years over an ERROR with their game, you bet I am fanboy. Worse, people like you who KNOWINGLY stir up crap in legitimate threads over issues with the game get to keep on posting your bile. WTB: justice. [/quote] I know
[quote who="Deth2" reply="65" id="2751691"] Quoting surlybob, reply 61 If that's the case then no game developer uses DRM! Hooray! What was supposed to be so different about this company, again? If Stardock is going to act like one of the big boys, there going to start getting treated like them. Fact is, if Blizzard put a game out in this state, they'd have a class action lawsuit going. Yup. I've played every iteration of World of W
[quote who="DKL" reply="45" id="2751510"] Quoting Rune_74, reply 44 Your a loser, who the hell comes on the official forums and says he pirated their game? Complete moron. If you would care to actually read the thread before going fanboy-rage again, you would notice that people complain that it suddenly stopped working with user-created OOM fix. You know, its the thing that lets people, who STILL get constant crashes, actually play the game t
[quote who="Kemsley" reply="43" id="2751487"][removed] [/quote] Your a loser, who the hell comes on the official forums and says he pirated their game? Complete moron.
I'm willing to bet they don't want to put something up that is not good, after the last couple weeks. I'm not sure how I myselft feel about multiplayer, it will be neat to have it(and yes they have to) but for me I'm not sure how much I would use it.
[quote who="Serapth" reply="40" id="2749635"] Quoting Sinful01, reply 32 ... but what REALLY infuriates me, is when I'm in a thread reading about legitimate complaints (usually in the ones about framerate slowdowns on PCs like my own - I'm there trying to find out if its being addressed, and/or if anyone has any temporary fixes) - and rabid fanboys rush in, usually the same 4-6 names - it is sad I can recognize them after a few days, isn't it? - and start sho
[quote who="Palmtree" reply="114" id="2749543"] Quoting Xan, reply 110 Oh please. http://www.quartertothree.com/game-talk/showthread.php?t=60997 Time stamps are your friend. I've read that thread. Angie Gallant's posts there are far more pleasant in tone than most I've read in this thread. [/quote] I'm shocked anyone would want to be part of that forum to be honest, lot
[quote who="Palmtree" reply="107" id="2749527"] Quoting Xan, reply 102 It's called decency. From where I'm sitting it looks more like a very ugly lashing out, championed by a Stardock employee no less, against a woman who said critical things in a reasonable manner. The personal attacks, the way her motives have been put in question, the way people have ignored what she said and focused on
[quote who="surlybob" reply="97" id="2749483"] Quoting Palmtree, reply 93 You know, reading this thread got me thinking the same thing. The number of people willing to go to bat for a bad novel is astounding.Dude, what's your problem!? Grammar doesn't matter as long as it's understandable!! [/quote] Heh, it's not that we are going to bat for the novel, just for a obvious problem with the reviewer.
[quote who="Palmtree" reply="93" id="2749470"] Quoting Arzon, reply 84 That thread is really depressing. Are these adults? You know, reading this thread got me thinking the same thing. The number of people willing to go to bat for a bad novel is astounding. [/quote] Not so much for a bad novel, but a bad judgement call by her to review it. Further mor
[quote who="Arzon" reply="84" id="2749431"] Quoting TheJaker, reply 56 Heh. I learned about QuarterToThree.com thanks to PC Gamer and discovered a hilarious thread: http://www.quartertothree.com/game-talk/showthread.php?t=60997 Check out the asshole parade in that thread. It's hilarious. They're obsessed with Brad Wardell. That thread is really depressing. Are these adults? [/quote] &n
[quote who="hairrorist" reply="75" id="2749403"]Wow, just wow. I'm sure that banning was traumatic, and the entire clan has bent their collective might, using all professional avenues, and dedicating much thought and dedication to avenging this Internet Injustice. [/quote] As sad as that sounds, it does happen, especailly the crazy ones...not saying she is crazy but if any of this is the reasons for the review then...