AMDG

[quote who="rossanderson48" reply="22" id="2764809"] Multiplayer should just be forgotten right now perhaps even a year before trying to implement that [/quote] Actually multiplayer is just another beta at this point. While the bugs can be fixed and the game can be balanced at some point, the main problem remains content - we have two factions with limited differences, low mobility ( bad transports, no dedicated spells for exploring ) and uninteresting rewards for quests. The gam

[quote quoting="post"]... the combat system is flawed ? [/quote] The combat system is not flawed, it's broken. In addition to that there are too few unique units and special abilities - it looks like Warcraft 2 all over again in terms of faction differences. Guess they wait for book 3 in order to produce something like GC2 TA. I expected more. Anyway, I bought the LE after release in order to gave them a chance.

I'm also waiting for my LE copy. I wonder why the book was not included.

[quote who="falconne2" reply="43" id="2763191"] Personally I think city building is the weakest part of the game. [/quote] Compared to the GC2 TA and their unique buildings I'd say yes - but somebody has to sell Book 2 and 3.

There are two well-implemented ideas - dynasties and landscape-altering spells. The game suffers because of a lack of content ( special units with special abilities come to mind ). Kingdoms and empires are also way too similar. Transports are beyond bad - ironically the lore is not implemented ( we have a huge poster with a levitating chaneller but no such spell - not even a hot air baloon )