Nikitosina

AoW3 is simply better in all ways. Can't stop playing it. [e digicons]:D[/e]

I'm totally agree with The_Biz . The problem is also in the lack of time. In order to start making AI and teach it playing, you need to have all game features implemented first. Modern developers rushes to release games in sales on beta stages (or even earlier). Due to financial reasons nobody wants to wait half year for AI coders to create and balan

No. It would be better to make completly new game of the similar type.

Agreed. There is no way to make good AI with easy effort for strategy game.

Fixes are good but i don't like the way you change spells mana costs. You should increase the cost with each cast (i.e. 500 first cast, 1000 second time, 2000....)

I spend last weekend playing fallen enchantress and i would like to say thanks to devs team - the game is good. I played Elemental WoM 2 years ago and FE is a big step forward. Actually i beat small map with 2 opponents on challenging difficulty level by finishing epic quest (around 250 seasons). During the game i used to play with 3 heroes team. The main danger was wandering monsters, AI was good but die quickly. I had a feeling that all my cities and defending armies was useless. Al

poor warg... and poor design.

I can't see anything special here.

Random events = random game. Do we need random and unbalanced game?

I will try 1.3. Hope to see good game - not early beta.

Random science? I don't like it.

sounds good. But you will face a problem when player will take only the best solution. In order to avoid this you should make every weapon and armor unique.

The middle market is probably most product dependent. The share could seriously shrink or grow based on expectations. I could make a game for lowest or highest market. Middle is like a bonus for your success.

This game does not need random events. There are a lot of randomn features in game already. Honestly i can't define a short list of things you need to change in order to make your game "cool". The main point is every aspect need to be reworked. According to your message 1.3 will be "beta" as well.

Only Abeix art is satisfactory. Other guys looks weird.

AT RELEASE: E: War of Magic: 4/10 Civilization V: 8/10 Starcraft 2: 9/10 Fallout: New Vegas: 9/10 END OF 2010: E: War of Magic: 5/10 Civilization V: 9/10 Starcraft 2: 9.5/10 Fallout: New Vegas: 10/10 NOW: E: War of Magic: 5/10 Civilization V: 9/10 Starcraft 2: 9.5/10 Fallout: New Vegas: 10/10

medium or smaller. There is no reason to play larger maps in Elemental.

UI placed in Art category. Now i understand the root of the problem. Move UI under design lead.

Good. I hope to see a better game in that expansion.

It is sooo stupid to work on AI before implementing all features and making general changes like global mana pool.

Good article. I like it.

Since I'm not played Elementals from 1.06 i will try this patch soon. Again, i see a lot of items in the list (changes) but it is only bug fixes and balance, nothing really new exept for global mana pool. Also it is strange for me to balance half-finished product.

Can't see any changes. Still ugly "you". Still good vs bad. Bad guys are ugly (why?). Same factions with no real differences. The view of the world is still sucks for the "epic" strategy game (cloth map is much better for playing). So what was changed? Mana pool? Bugs? Is it all?

Good to see target date. You have a lot of things to do guys. Keep it up!

Good news at last. Looking forward for 1.1.