Scoutdog

Banned for having a shiny head.

I see the creation of skeletons requiring enough bone to form a true skeleton, AND having that bone be from the same person. You could theoretically make a skeleton out of bone shards, provided that you had them all.

Banned for not caring what time it is.

Banned for having a dirty mind.

Why are you so obsessed with strippers? It's making me a little bit uneasy...

So, who goes next?

Confirmed! My favorite episode is probably "exploding pants". I have seasons 1, 2, and 3 as boxed sets.

I think the main problem comes when you mix selfishness with stupidity: just look at wall street/detroit.

In reality, there are always more ways to destroy a defrense than there are to make it. However, from a strategic perspective, defenses HAVE to carry SOME level of value. Therefore, we need to come up with a way to make it esier to build than to destroy. The first thing that springs to mind is a magic system in which it always takes more energy to undo a spell than to put it in. There does not need to be a reason for this because it is a law of physics, the same way there is no "reason" why p

[quote]Of course that raises the question of whether we'll have any 'metamagic' spells at all. Dev journal on magic, pretty please![/quote] I second that! Now, about this wall thing: I could see it happening either way. A spell "move stone" could be used to send stone flying in all directions (destroying the wall) as well as piling it neatly in a line (building a wall). However, it would definately take a different spell to actually counter-act a specific defensive spell. I guess what

Is this a mistake, or have you lost your mind?

Banned if you do, banned if you don't.[e digicons]}:)[/e]

Banned for being lost.

FOUND IT: Former Texas Schoolbook Depository, 411 Elm street, Dallas, TX,

Banned for having a name that looks like it is spelled backwards no matter which way you read it.

Banned for being homophobic.

Europe, North America, or other?

Banned for doing a Homer Simpson.

Stardock IS the dark side....

Don't worry, we're not normal. Ranting is my natural state, therefore I am stable while ranting.

I like a lot of what you said, and the "Mexican Standoff" gave me an idea: the loyalty of your councilmembers would not be assumed. Instead, you would have a probability that they would betray you. The more capable the member, the more likely the betrayal. You could keep them in line through military/police power, spies, bribes, and possible other stuff like blackmail.

Whatever. I'm just saying the option should be open.

Banned for referring to my Master as "Star Wars Guy".

Thanks.

Banned for thinking of a zombie licking hair. [e digicons]:P[/e] [e digicons];P[/e] [e digicons]:P[/e] [e digicons];P[/e] [e digicons]:P[/e] [e digicons];P[/e] [e digicons]:P[/e] [e digicons];P[/e] [e digicons]:P[/e] [e digicons];P[/e] [e digicons]:P[/e] [e digicons];P[/e] [e digicons]:P[/e] [e digicons];P[/e] . Happy now?