Irremovable curses? Definately not until the VERY end game, hopefully not even then (at least in terms of gameplay: irremovable cureses in the BACKSTORY sound like a good way to slip in ability penalties and "gamey" restrictions.)
Scoutdog
Actually, I think Titans would fit the bill pretty well... you bring up an intetresting point though, that soverign (and perhaps scion) reproductive preferances would change over time, as they steadily lose their humanity and don't age as fast......[quote]"lets fuck a demon to create an army"[/quote]Oh gear lord... now I can't get the "interspecies prostitution" coverstory scene from D9 out of my mind.... thanks a lot !
Banned for asking for it.
Banned for too many returns . <p
Banned for wanting to eat danielost. Now I'm hungry!!!
I always invisioned undead as fairly sentient (at least in most cases): they either were so frekkin EVIL in life they thought they'd stick around (in noticibly diminished form) to prey on a few more people, or are bound to the will of the necromancer but still retain consciousness and thought.........
[quote] [e digicons]:cylon:[/e] +[e digicons]:borg:[/e] = ESRB[/quote]Hey, what did the Borg or Cylons ever do to you!? Sure, they try to wipe out organic life on a weekly basis but, I mean, comparing them to the ESRB ??!! That's just cruel... Seriously, though, the devs do have to play semi-nice with them: it's just marketing that lower ratings equate to more buyers. And besides, have mercy on those o
Sounds interesting enough... I'd like for the avatars to appear and just ally with you for a while before actually getting intimate.... makes far more sense that way.
Banned for trapping a trap.
Banned for using ppl. I hate that term.
[quote]Any chance of creating breeding programs to make meaner monsters?[/quote]Yes. If one isn't in, I'll put it in.[quote]Sure its already been asked but, harem situations possible?[/quote]Likely no. I doubt the ESRB would smile on polygamous factions... and the breeding system will likely be rather... erm.... abstracted in any case.[quote]Possible to marry things that are not memeber of faction, aka spirits or demons or outsiders or whatever?[/quote]Perhaps. I don't see wh
[quote] * * Member No.2,876,725 * Karma+1 February 8, 2010 2:25:14 PM We could even have a stampede option. Those herders look like a great target, until they whip the herd into a berserk rage and send 10,000 insane cows to crush you.[/quote]Hmmmm....... now there 's a thought....... get ten-odd farmers to train their thousand-odd cows to attack Krath red'n black, and there's the mortal plane on a platter!
[quote]Ya, female line of inheritance is an interesting twist. I'm assuming that would be stuffed into some sort of race/faction editor or whatnot. I'm a noob to this, so feel free to start throwing rotten fruit. This isn't the real FiAtin, by the way. I was never here.[/quote]For a noob, you're surprisingly insightful..... GW Swicord and I have been agitating for this for months..... I for one would actually also enjoy seeing strange lines of inheritance such as third c
Banned because it should be non- banners.
Banned because I care.
Sentance structure wierd for banned.
Banned for accidentally-on-purpose banning.
Banned because that should be "for", not "of".
I actually brought this up a while ago with the concept of MAMD (Mutually Assured Magical Destruction): Spells that are so powerful and unpredictable that they would only be used as a last resort against overwealming odds, as they would likely get you killed as well.
Banned for regarding theories. Its the communist fascist gay Muslim death panels next, I tells y'all!!!
Banned for breaking Dawn. What did she ever do to you ?
Banned for wanting relief. You sound like an Activia ad.
Banned for an uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuGLY mask.
Banned for asking about what you won instead of banning.
Banned for not having much of anything under that mask.