Great work Stardock! Always appreciate all the free content!
ProfCS101
Me three! Been a GalCiv fan since 06, super excited about GalCiv3!
Well said, Brad, in your initial post. You continue to prove yourself to be an honorable man, and I will continue to give Stardock my business.
Brad, hold your head high. Don't let the media's persecution of you for having opinions stop your communications with your fans. You and Stardock are the best development house around -precisely because us fans feel like you really care.
Cari, I also have that bug where I see ALL ship components (weapons, etc) in my designer regardless of whether I have researched them or not. Further Bug: In my game (tough difficultly with associated intelligence), none of the AIs are building military ships and they also are not building star bases or construction ships (although they built colony ships early on). I did alt-tab at one point, and when I returned that seems to be when the lack of building started. Perhaps the fix for th
Plus, did I mention that his idea of "pornocaust" would be hilarious if it wasn't so utterly and completely absurd. No matter what your hippy parents tell you, The_Politico, no conservative I know believes in that bullshit.
The_Politico, I, like many other conservatives have never even heard of this guy. So why would he be an issue. Many DEMOCRATS have probably never heard of this guy. He's a crazy lunatic who just hasn't been institutionalized. Would you go to an insane asylum and get all upset if someone said crazy stuff? That's my feelings on where he's coming from. Also, keep in mind, he's a CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE. That means nothing. He doesn't speak for the party, he speaks for himself. Nearly anyon
[quote]yes, because everyone in the world needs to adopt the same FREEDOM AS #1 PRIORITY WOOOOOOOO viewpoint as americans right?i would assume you're a troll as that's amazingly over the top but meh whatever[/quote] I'd prefer not to have governmental officials slaughtering my own people by the tens of million. Liberty is pretty damn important in that case, huh? I hate to break it to your 17 year old idealism, but there are some ideas that are good, and some ideas that are bad.
mightygoobi, your proselytizing of the Chinese government is superb, and perhaps some less intelligent Americans will believe every word. Frankly, I don't. You claim you can speak out against the government (without getting shot, hah). Thats fantastic, but here in America, we can CHANGE our governmental leaders. In fact, we can CHANGE the entire party of the government. Why is that possible? Because we had the balls to FIGHT for it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_revolution Also,
Interesting naming method arnotol, I do something similar (but usually without the weapon/def/eng stats). I usually prefix with race (like Terran, or for longer race names something shortened like Alt for Altarian), then follow with a size designator (tiny - fighter; small - frigate; medium - destroyer; large - cruiser; huge - battleship/dreadnought) and finally with a model designation (incrementing with improved stats and modules. For example: Alt Destroyer Mk1 (firs
Great game, well deserved score! Good work SD and Brad.
Brad, I love you and Stardock more then you can imagine. This is looking AWESOME.
[quote]The data (ICO stats and singleplayer commentary) says siege is being used as a massed strike force (and in many cases, multiple strike forces). Its obvious why too: the cost and supply usage is low and you can't kill them quick enough to stop them (nor can you strike at them elsewhere in time). Thus they cost more and are more easily killed - we really want players to have to choose whether they go heavy siege and when and where they should strike with them. But if there is seri
Blair, don't you ever sleep? lol
I personally feel that carriers are fine. They are so easy to pop and once the fighters/bombers are taken down by flak, they are no offensive abilities at all.
[quote] That is insulting and not true. [/quote] Relax. Something you must learn (something that SD already has) is that not everyone will like every aspect of your game. You don't need to respond with displeasure every time someone doesn't agree with you.
Agree totally on a major buff for PJIs. Please fix, kthx.
I agree with the OP. There are enough musical chair RTS out there already. Do us a favor SD/IC and put back in real phase disruptors.
[quote] Are you building Cobalts to take out those seige frigates? Are you scouting ahead to see them coming? Are your Guass Defenses all clogged up against the grav well or protecting your planet? Are you using bombers? Check out these tips: https://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/?forumid=402&aid=175318#1446763
[quote] He and his masterful samples of English vocabulary have been removed. [/quote] Thank you.
Montana, got mine today. (two days after I changed my shipping address with stardock too, very fast)
[quote] Defenses exist to delay and deter, not to bunker up a planet such that it's invincible. They were never meant to stop a moderately determined force, moreso just insurgents or small to medium pirate attacks, and give enemies something to occupy them until you can get reinforcements there to defend. But, then why does it cost more than 3 capital ships to fully fortify a planet, if its never supposed to do anything else than del
Good ideas OP. /signed
Terrible troll post. Go away GONGYTRON.
[quote] "make this another starcraft, not another supreme commander." I must admit, that was one of the oddest comments I've read in the past few weeks. Really. [/quote] Indeed. But it is not surprising, since the original poster of that comment is now known to be fond of zergling rushes. KEKEKEKEKEKE ^_^