did you try testing it with no life supports, and with only 1, 2, 3, etc.? if my casual impressions were correct, you wouldn't see any increases after the 4th LS module or so. of course, i never claimed they were correct.
[quote who="GmOOnii" reply="6" id="2225812"] Do you know how many life supports it would take to cover the whole Immense map if I had one planet? I was setting up a survey ship. 10 life support gives me 19.6pc. and 6 Sensor IVs that gives the cap of 15r, you should saw the ship before I found out there was a cap on sensors (30 Sensor IVs that gave me 75r) I except there is no cap on life support?[/quote] actually, i believe there is a cap on range. i'm just not e
[quote who="KzintiPatriarch" reply="1" id="2211397"]Thats my opinion Dys, and I'd like to see his acomplishment. I think he deserves to be recognized for a great game. As to whether pndrev would want to put it in the rankings thats mainly up to him, but in my mind, Random would be the leader.[/quote] ah, sorry. for a second there i thought you were throwing your weight around, as the saying goes. my mistake.
with all due respect, WTF does "your book" matter?
nice speeds. but you'll never be cool.
[quote who="Snarkotamus" reply="9" id="2196601"]Especially impressive since it is Dark Avatar![/quote] ahh, how times have changed [e digicons]:D[/e] and of course, good game motti!
[quote who="Zyxpsilon" reply="3" id="2194827"]And to repeat myself from the post which possibly enforced him into the above weird remark (i guess, anything i write here is pointless to him); GC3 will or should allow multiplayer *duel tournaments* matchups to clarify the "Metaverse" controversy which, btw, might be wrongfully interpreted even by me.[/quote] but it doesn't. it doesn't have multiplayer, and it's not x-worlds, so get the fuck over yourself. the others are here to play <em
it takes a spark to start a fire.
...yet another thread where the topic was derailed and conflict instigated by a comment zyx made. why does anyone bother responding with more than: [quote who="dystopic" reply="18" id="2191191"]yeah sure, that.[/quote] ...?
[quote who="GmOOnii" reply="19" id="2191249"]@Dystopic, Because I have nobody in my empire (expect one person, got me who it is) so my learnings have to come from myself and people who give me advice and special tips in running my empire and how to play like you do.[/quote] as i said, empires become great because of strong leadership.
[quote who="Zyxpsilon" reply="16" id="2191007"]So, in fact dysto... you're saying Empires plot against each other's to draw the most promising potential in as many ways as possible? Next round tournament please; leader X faces leader Y in a match up (multiplayer style) where scoring doesn't count but rather who Won & Lost, once. GC3, upcoming in a fullscale TBS simulation near you.[/quote] yeah sure, that.
most of the great players got to their peaks by either investing large amounts of attention and scrutiny into the game and refining their play for optimized score output, or learning the strategies those few players developed. most of that learning has indeed taken place inside empires, not because empires horde the most useful secrets, but because we offer greater assistance to our members in organizing and implementing those strategies. the two strongest empires you concern yourself
[quote who="Snarkotamus" reply="3" id="2169773"]He should get a special medal for busting 2 million points in a combined total of only 10 years. Another week or two, and he'll have all 3 of his characters wearing those medals.[/quote] and with considerably fewer games than the few other folks who've achieved such feats.
that gold medal does look nice, CL. it'll look nicer when it's got a friend to keep it company [e digicons]}:)[/e]
whew some big scores getting thrown around today. no wonder you two were so antsy for the MV to come back up.
those dual lands were awesome; i still think it's a shame they were discontinued from the core set by the revised (or was it 4th?) edition. they introduced a much weaker set of 5 dual lands (only "allied" colors) in Ice Age, but they had some rather disappointing stipulation to their use: i can't remember what for certain, but i want to say they either converted colorless mana to colored mana, or drained your health, or didn't untap normally. it was something that really restricted their usef
heh ouch, that had to hurt in hindsight. i didn't start playing the game until the revised edition/fallen empires expansion. the cost of those alpha rares by then made it easy to agree that they were over-powered. i rarely entered tourneys that allowed them, perhaps as much because i couldn't afford them as because of how over-powered they were. brother and best friend at one point agreed to allow each other to use fake versions of those cards even though we'd never have originals (wi
stardock has failed us; the death of the metaverse goes un-eulogiz'd.
[quote who="mADDYman" reply="6" id="2150059"]pretty much.... Oh come on what's worse than making an invincbile card like that?[/quote] making a black lotus and mox jewels, that's worse. i mean, sure that cattank is invincible, but it has a 27 mana casting cost. most decks aren't even capable of producing that much mana in a single turn, even if every mana card has been drawn and played. yeah... i was a M:TG tourney judge for a little bit. it's been more than a while, but i sti
[quote who="mADDYman" reply="24" id="2143562"]*Ignore the text someone had too much time o their hands when they wrote that.[/quote] they had too much time when they wrote that, but not when they photoshopped the image?
nice, motti. i still can't tell if it's a full TFT or a TN hybrid, but meh, if you like it that's what matters. again in these forums, happy bday!
you could use some bug spray in here, seth.
[quote who="MottiKhan" reply="5" id="2129854"]Actually, I thought I was fairly clear before, but perhaps I missed something. Trans fats are unhealthy and that's the main reason that I forgo fries with my cheeseburger. Had I intended to buy another sequel to the Dragon series, I might have used my credit card, but as you can see...[/quote] +1 karma for making me laugh. [quote who="jacklv" reply="7" id="2129992"]i am shocked anyone would chose to ban zyx. in th
i'd embed this if i could in here, but here's a good one for ya CL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dRjHsbWAUs
[quote who="KzintiPatriarch" reply="4" id="2126770"]What are you talking about GmOOnii? There's no rules for what sort of font or color you have to use. Someone is selling you a load of horse-shi1t. You can use whatever strikes your fancy. You dont have to delete or change anything.[/quote] actually CL did put it forth as a "rule" for the twilight pub, but i believe he was speaking metaphorically. obviously it doesn't apply to other threads unless the OP says s
GalCiv2 Forums