Mmrnmhrm

So it's the Voltron of game studios?

Nt

[quote who="Lord Xia" reply="21" id="3382991"] I would want it. You will always have those dicks who will always hate the new version of the old thing they love no matter how good the new version is( Firaxis XCOM or Beth Fallout), but fuck those guys. Stardock Star Control sounds awesome.[/quote] That's why they invented 4chan and somethingawful and RPGCodex. Keeps "those dicks" quarantined. :-)

Makes me wish the mini map had more functionality.

Lol. Thus is the kind of post that could be quoted for a cracked.com article on why gaming entitlement. i love this quote: [quote] (1) Boring early game : My opinion on early game of ALL of Stardock's 4X games, with few reservations : unbelievably bad. [/quote] the question post people will want to know if whether legendary heroes, an expansion pack, is better than fallen en

I hate to say it but most of these suggestions would turn the game into a tedious mess. I think they are great ideas for minders to try out but I don't want to be forced to play the game you guys seem to want. i would rather they spend time polishing and enhancing what they have.

I enjoyed fallen enchantress. It's was a good game. This is a great game.

I've been finding that the AI casts a lot of spells on me strategically but the game doesn't always do a good job informing me that this has happened. I'd like there to be a notification.

Finally getting some time to try out the latest betas. You know, I liked Fallen Enchantress. It was a good game. Unfortunately, after playing Legendary Heroes, I don't know if I'll ever play FE again. LH is just that much better for me.

[quote who="Borg999" reply="95" id="3350633"] My real view: Corps should be able to profit any way they legally can, as long as it's not at the expense of other peoples well being. [/quote] So who decides if it's at someone else's expense?

[quote who="Borg999" reply="91" id="3350582"] 1. Outsourcing's legal. 2. It increases profits 3. stimulates the economy 4. Maximizes shareholder value 5. Keeps taxes low 6. Keeps more money in the pocket of the people who know how to grow it. 7. and creates new jobs at some ambiguous point in the future. If you disagree you are a lazy good for nothing immigrant loving commie pinko

[quote who="Phaedyme" reply="57" id="3349536"] I think it is reasonable to expect support for games, and expect announced patches to be released. It's not undeserved entitlement to want updates and fixes for games one has paid for. The notion that purchasing a product doesn't entitle one to customer service is actually utterly bizarre to me. However, I do not think this means that customers are entitled to be abusive jerks toward anyone.[/quote] That's a strawma

[quote who="NiknudStunod" reply="59" id="3350339"] I would like to transport you back to the early to mid 90's. You didn't have day one patches because games were tested and released when they were ready not when the publishers wanted them out. Games didn't ship bug free but they didn't ship in the broken state a large majority of games of today do. I can tell you I am unimpressed with your attitude and dismissal of a person d

Wow Chib, way to detour into crazy town. I wonder, do you know the names of the people who programmed these forums? How about the person who designed the font that you use to type your diatribe? Do you know the name of the person who chose the colors for the forum you're using? No? Then where do you get off complaining if FB doesn't know the names of whoever cleans the Stardock building? The problem with people like you is that you use your unearned holier-than-t

[quote who="id_est" reply="12" id="3349405"] "This is pretty obnoxious. If you feel the game is being rushed (just like people thought GalCiv was rushed and Sins was rushed and so on) then feel free to wait until February to play it." © Frogboy, July 20, 2010[/quote] Are you just practicing on being a dick?

[quote who="Dr Guy" reply="18" id="3324274"] Quoting tazgecko, reply 10 "Angie Gallant",never heard of her. That's a good point. By mentioning her, you are feeding her ego. I doubt she has 10% of the name recognition you do. But if you mention her, she will close the gap.[/quote] If she was trying to get that kind of attention as Angie gallant she wouldn't do her dirty work under pseudonyms. Shine some light on a troll and they s

The last update came out less than 48 hours ago and people are complaining about a lack of support? Wow. As for modding, yes, like 99.999% of other games out there, there are some files you have to modify in the game directory. Most games I play that are modded have a utility, made by modders, that will swap in and out different data files. FE at least lets you modify and extend the game in all sorts of ways without doing that. I think ti would be more reasonable f

[quote who="Istari" reply="26" id="3304162"]v1.12 was released just a couple weeks ago. Version 1.2 is in development. We don't plan to put out more than 1 update per month (though we did put out 2 updates in December but that's the exception). We are listening to your suggestions and requests and add them to the list. [/quote] In fact, the last update was released 5 days before Christmas. A whopping 2 weeks ago. Appa

[quote] MOM playing on a small map with 4 computer opponents set to hard or impossible definitely has a better AI challenge.[/quote] MOM wasn't capable of conquering other players. The only thing higher difficulties did was make it quicker at casting the spell of making or whatever it was called. What makes FE's AI nice is that on its challenging level it provides a pretty good challenge and it's not getting bonuses. The same can'

[quote who="Rhaegor" reply="22" id="3301381"] Quoting Mmrnmhrm, reply 19Can someone name a land based game similar to this that has a better AI? I'd really like to hear it. HOMM VI? Warlock? MOM? Civilization V? Other than Galactic Civilizations, which doesn't have magic, I can't think of one. I can't win above Hard on a typical map. If you really want the best challenge, IMO, you really need to play as each player and design l

Can someone name a land based game similar to this that has a better AI? I'd really like to hear it. HOMM VI? Warlock? MOM? Civilization V? Other than Galactic Civilizations, which doesn't have magic, I can't think of one. I can't win above Hard on a typical map. If you really want the best challenge, IMO, you really need to play as each player and design lots of units. This game's AI will use the units you make and a lot of the challeng

[quote] Come on guys, fix it - the whole saga is doing your credibility the world of harm.[/quote] I think you'd likely get more support without the drama. I play the game all the time and I've never run into it. I don't doubt you have. But saying it's ruining Stardock's credibility or that FE is stumbling on it sounds like something out of Star Trek conventions "Man, remember in episode 67. In the first scene Spock's hair is all messed

Hostile work environment:

Since this is the best fantasy strategy game I've played in years, I'm pretty happy. I can think of lots of directions they can take from here. I saw your thread about AOW:SM. The problem with that game is that it really didn't have any AI. I think ones appreciateion of Fallen Enchantress will come down to how important it is to have decent computer players to go up against. The only AI that remotely touches this game's is Civilization IV's (not

Nice. What this game needs are more skeletons to mod.