SysMetrix 1.0 released! SysMetrix is a skinnable clock and metering application unlike any other. It provides system metrics in a variety of interesting, useful, and cool ways. It can monitor and report on over 40 different types of statistics such as time and date, CPU usage, memory usage, network traffic, unread email, and much more! It can represent the information in many different ways, such as plain text, bar graphs, histograms, sliders, and even analog-style gauges. Click here t
Xymantix
Sorry Brian, I didn't mean to come off being rude or hostile. One of the points that I was trying to make was that, since I don't have a ton of free time, it's probably a better use of my time to skin something that I see for hours each day.
Here's why I don't bother with those: 1) I recall that the resolution is really crappy - 16 colors max and small dimensions. Given those stringent requirements, you're not going to be able to do much to make the boot screen look very nice. 2) It only shows up on my machine for about 1-2 seconds. Plus, I only reboot every few days. So, it's something that I'd see for a couple of seconds per week. Therefore, it's not worth spending a lot of time on. <A HREF="h
Did you drink good coffee for me?
I've thought about adding those, as it can be done and would be kind of neat. I know that other metering programs hook into the MBM dlls. My problem with that is that you'd end up with non-portable themes. If you make a theme that's full of MBM stuff, it wouldn't be useful to others that don't have MBM installed. I'd have to think of a clever way to componentize everything first. <img src="http://images.stardock.com
You're welcome adni18! It may sound a bit cheesy, but I'm glad that I'm able to contribute to the skinning world in a variety of ways. It's truely been one of my most rewarding hobbies in the recent years.
Yeah, but I think the upload instructions still say that it has to be a .bmp. (15 seconds later) Ok, I just checked. The field descriptors are like this: *Preview Image (.jpg only): *Bitmap Zip: which implies that the wall should be a bitmap instead of a .jpg or other format. Before I knew better, I converted a couple of walls from .jpg to .bmp in the past when uploading because of this. <A HREF="https://www.wincustomize.com/index.asp?Cmd=full&Ne
Thanks joetheblow, glad you like it! Make bunches of skins for it GoodMorphing: Mine has a litte spinner to in the upper middle when it's retreiving threads - doesn't yours?
Maybe "no, until I have something to advertise, then yes"
Found it in there, Werewolf! I must have missed it the first 7 times Thanks.
From the os you can probably do a "netstat /a". But yes, there are probably some good apps out there. http://www.webattack.com/ usually has some good ones, but the site appears to be down now.
I don't know if I saved the link that I used the last time or not. At any rate, check out http://www.deviantart.com/deviation.php?id=552633. They put a lot of work into this as it's 61 pages long and even has templates. I usually see how they cover the shared line in the titlebar.bmp, the maximize/close buttons in the pledit, etc. in order to see if they've listed all of the gotchas. <img src="http://images.stardock.
And for heavens sake read some of the winamp skinning tutorials that are out there. Otherwise you'll be confused and ripping your hair out for days. It's got a couple of idiosyncrasies where sections are off by x pixels, share a pixel from another section, etc. If you're aware of that from the start, you'll save yourself a lot of time. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmidd
Don't be afraid! If things get out of hand, which they won't, just click on the systray icon for it or run it again from explorer.
Have fun, and drink some coffee for me!
Ok, I just started using the WinCustomize Browser and really like it so far. I've got a couple of questions about threads, though. 1) It seems as though when reading a thread via Internet explorer (instead of the WinCustomize Browser), it keeps track of the last response that I read for a particular thread. So, if I click on the thread later after others have posted to it, the thread loads and it goes to the last response that I read. With the WinCustomize Browser, it doesn't seem
I forgot to mention that Stardock usually increments their version numbers closer and closer to the upcoming release. So a 1.99 means that it's almost ready to be a 2.0 release. This is kind of neat as it gives you a better idea of what's ahead and approximately how far off it is.
Thanks, Kinrik! Actually, that's the way autohide works The idea is that it's not supposed to get in your way, so it will disappear if you mouseover it. If you *want* to interact with it, just hold down the ALT, SHIFT, or CTRL key (any one of them) and then it won't hide on a mouseover. It probably takes some getting used to, but it's kind of neat once you do. <A HREF="https://www.wincustomize.c
There are probably several different ways of versioning software. Some use major and minor numbers, some use alpha characters, some use both a revision and a version, the list goes on. SysMetrix's versioning is pretty basic. It simply follows VB's Major.Minor.Revision scheme - I just autoincrement for each build of SysMetrix. For me there are only two interesting points: 1) The major number is 0, which means that it's not yet at a 1.0 release. In other words, it's still in
Good idea, Kinrik Seriously, though, I've been checking greyhaze's web site faithfully ever since he first mentioned the 8-ball skin. I'd love to see it, regardless of how complete it is.
Is that Australian for AOL?!?! (Get it - take off on the Foster's ads)
Thanks for the nice words, everybody!
I used Mandrake 8 for a while at work and was impressed. I liked it because I wanted to get up and running quickly without having to waste a lot of time on the learning curve.
Another way of looking at it would be that die-hard users of Litestep, Nextstart, Hoverdesk, DesktopX, etc. are less likely to make WindowBlinds skins because they'd spend hours and hours skinning something they never use or see.
Actually, I know what you're talking about Elwin. I use NextStart all of the time (well, except for when I'm using DesktopX) and so I don't ever see a taskbar, systray, start menu, etc. I've done a few WB skins in the past (when they were simpler), but now I think I have a mental block on them because there are just so many things to skin it's rather intimidating. I know that realistically it can't be too bad because some people can seemingly whip out one or two WB skins a week. If