Mr Kerry attacked Pres Bush again when he said, “I think that this one (referring to North Korea’s nuclear capability) is the most serious failures and challenges to the security of the United States, and it really underscores the way in which George Bush talks the game but doesn't deliver, They have taken their eye off the real ball, They took it off in Afghanistan
Yesterday in Iowa, Vice President Cheney said “It's absolutely essential that eight weeks from today, on Nov. 2, we make the right choice, because if we make the wrong choice then the danger is that we'll get hit again and we'll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States," Here’s why his statement is true. (
Stevendedalus Here's something for you to digest. Please visit - http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2004/kerryawards.pdf It shows a copy of a formal "Request for Investigation" dated August 18, 2004 regarding Lt(jg) John Forbes Kerry about his medals and his anti-war activities. It appears that when he was bemoaning his comrades in Vietnam as worst that Genhis Khan, the guy was still in the Navy. And that's a no no. <B
Well now that the liberals have decided that they gonna win the election and since Edwards copied what Cheney said during the previous campaign, there are 3 things that voters would like some answers. Maybe you have. (1) Why are they not resigning their senate seats? (2) Why are they not admitting that they are liberals? (3) Why did
Error: The word "hile" should have been "hide". aconservative
The Supreme Court had elevated the rights of foreigners to be the same as US citizens. As a result, they were allowed to hile outside the Gorelick's Wall and their crimes became federal crimes. If they were not classified as federal crimes, then it would have been easier for the government to catch dealt with them accordingly. </fo
Jamie Gorelick tried to cover absolved herself by writing an OpEd in the Washington Post this weekend. She claimed that she did not write “the wall” that Ashcroft testified at the 9-11 commission. Now here’s Andrew C McCarthy’s reply. Mr McCarthy was a former chief assistant U. S. attorney who led the 1995 terrorism prosecution against the Sheik Omar Ab
The Big Bang is supposedly the meaning of "Bojinka". All that the commission members will ask them is about "Operation Bojinka". If Bush can declassifty his PDB then there should not be a problem in declassifying Clinton"s. aconservative
It involved a President Commission presided by Vice President Gore on how to prevent terrorist in using airplanes to conduct terrorism. It was not implemented because the decision makers decided that it involved “racial profiling”. Now tell that to the 9-11 families who lost their love ones and are on the verge of blaming Bush. Clinton administ
Jeblackstar - The letter was written by Congressman Christopher Shay, Chairman, Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations addressed to the Chairman and Deputy National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, dated March 24, 2004. If you wish to have a copy perhaps you can call the SubCommittee. aconservative
Jeblackstar and Sconn1 According to my reliable sources the chairman of the committee whom Clarke testified wrote to the Chairman of the 9-11 commission stating that his testimony was different. As I am writing this comment the Speaker and the Senate Leader are requesting that his testimony be declassified. Perhaps you will read this late today or tomorrow. Why don't you not get a hold of a book written by Richard Mint
When Clark appeared before the Congress, under oath, in September 2002, he was singing a different tune on the same subject. Would you guys agree to declassify his testimony he gave in September 2002 and us the public then will know if he is what you guys think he is? This should cast any doubt as to whom to believe - the Clarke two years ago or the Clarke today. How can anybody under oath testify on "terrorism" and say different thi
How can the media give credit to a guy who says this today and reverse himself the next? I thought the commission is interested in finding the truth. Can one say this is the truth one day then later on say that was false what I am saying now is the truth? If you were one of the commissioners, would you believe such a guy? Isn't that just a gimmich to sell a book? If the commission really wants the truth how come
Dear Mr Clarke, May repeat my sincere thanks when you apologize to the families of the 9-11 victims. I saw it and I hope it came from your heart. I am sure that most Americans will agree that those families need help - maybe, perhaps, it would be more meaningful if you you assign all the proceeds of your book to those families. Then th
As far as I can see, the contents of the letter is very real and no decent American voter can ignore the fact that Senator Kerry said what the letter described. How can one samefully criticize the morals and objectives of the U. S. Forces in the halls of Congress and now that he is looking for votes cover it as if it did not happen? aconservative alias "crooked and liar"
An interview can be short with 2 questions? 1. What can you do for me and the company? 2. Prove it?
If the ads are wrong or if you disagree of what they said, then the alternative would be to say why the ads are wrong and come back with a reply of what Kerry would do. The total absence of reply amd resulting to "crying foul" is not the solution. There are 20% of Americans out there that are waiting to make a decision who would make a better President - Bush or Kerry. Kerry stated that Republicans are "crooked" and "liars", but he ha
jul89 When you used the adjective "worst", you must have somebody in mind who was better. Let's start with Carter, then Reagan, then Bush Senior, then Clinton. Dld you say Bush is worst that Carter? If you so, explain what's are your facts. Reagan was a Republican so with Bush Senior - so bypass them. Take Clinton, what did Clinton do that affected you personally. If there is none, then say so. Then what did Clinton do
The problem with you libs is you can't cite a situation that the environment, energy and national service have affected you. If you know of anybody who had been hurt because of these policies then say it or write it. Spill out the names. Prove it! Name your source. Don't hide behind the skirt of your insults if you can't penetrate. Remorsefully admit it because it reflects who you are. Use words that only civilized people are accustomed to h
Robert Name one instances whereby Bush policies on the environment, energy and national service had affected you personally. I would like to discuss them. aconservative
jeblackstar Fine! aconservative
Jeblackster, I post articles in my blog to discuss the way I think. There are words in my vocabulary that I don't use and don't want to hear. I am not accustomed or raised that way using or hearing those words. I am sure that there are words that you would not like to hear or used at you. So is there something wrong in insisting decency to visitors for their comments to my blog, not your blog, but to my blog? aconse
Bul I like your comments but please don't use the "f....." word. aconservative
Hi Robert! Welcome. You used the word "policies". Are you referring to "what he had done" or "what he is thinking" or "what he is telling the people to get elected"? Or you like Kerry because somebody convinced you that he is a likable candidate. If the world is complicated, would you say things that you contradict when the weather is fine? People, especially those seeking for power, must show that they can be trusted.
Iraq has a new temporary constitution signed today. My mind recalls John Hancock and the others signing the Declaration of Independence. We celebrate its significance every 4th of July but we fail to understand what it really means how it should affect our very lives. It becomes secondary to the constitution which we never celebrate it’s signing. If the constitution is more important than the Declaration of
JoeUser Forums