Brad, you are an interesting individual. I am a bit disappointed you would start an article under the premises of restoring fact-based truth and carry on with some points that are absolutely ground less or extremely manipulated. Kind of a O'reilly of the Blogging... You mentioned in one of your post in response to a blogger to be specific, I will be. Here are the points I would love to read you elaborate with factual and reliable data. Or just admit that these are just your opinions on
spleenantidote
The paradox of being truthful but manipulative Who claimed Bush was a liar? You might call him manipulative, naïve, egocentric, paranoid, excessive, extremist, ultra-conservative, and dangerous at time… but not a liar. Unfortunately, he has had the tendency to be truthful. Truthful in a smart and manipulative way. He has been pretty good and consistent at walking his talk. Announcing his next move and executing on it. The main reasons behind this are two fold: 1/ it gives hi
What you are referring to is currently available through the web services, ASPx, J2EE and .net technologies. Have you thought of storing that "cell systems" information simply in Excel or Access. You can also custom-define a smart tag that would then link you straight to that repository. This would allow youto type let's say... "system stuff" in any Microsoft office environment and have that word highlighted and take you to your repository... and let you pull whatever information you need.
Upgrade to some decent wine. Pizza is enough of a torture to start with, to compound that with some "sweet carbonated whatever liquid". Enjoy
Thought I would share this insightfull article to illustrate my previous point on campaigning anomalies... Report Links Iraq Deals to Bush Donations Thu Oct 30,10:51 AM ET By LARRY MARGASAK, Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON - Companies awarded $8 billion in contracts to rebuild Iraq (news - web sites) and Afghanistan (news - web sites) have been major campaign donors to President Bush (news - web sites), and their executives have had important political and militar
Why didn't the democrats sit down at a table before rushing into this damaging campaign ? Why didn't they sit down and decide on a couple of candidates, two or three at most. I can understand opinions being different, or political approaches being slightly different in a party... but 9 candidates ??? It is serving two purposes right now... 1 / The republicans' campaing hasn't formally started yet, although Bush never really got out of his 2000 campaign and has spent more time
where are you in PNW ? Do you guys have snow ?
Who are you talking about ? A loved one obviously. What loved one ? Why do you feel this pain ? What is hurting you ?