Cybrnite

Cybrnite

Joined Member # 6970715
0 Posts 0 Replies 555 Reputation

[quote who="LightStar" reply="26" id="3758326"] Quoting , quoting post I use to subscribe to OD years ago when I was in I.T. and I just loved it - the unique styling; unlimited themes; DesktopX; ObjectDock; WindowBlinds; CursorFX; Gadgets... Thought I would re-visit now I'm working from home again, and it seems only a

71 Replies 283,133 Views

Whoa! Didn't mean to open a 'can of worms'... It's just that, seriously, years ago when I was 'into' OD and peripheral apps it was just sooo much fun. DesktopX was like an awesome GUI together with the 'Gadgets'. I have a dual-screen rig and just thought it would be real nice to get a unique set-up using OD & DTX etc. So I pays my well-earned GPB and when I get into it, it's like a desert with tumbleweed blowing around - so sad :( So my comment about including Obje

71 Replies 283,133 Views

[quote who="Yrgal" reply="1" id="3758228"] WindowBlinds Styles individually costly.. I agree. Not like it was some years back. I can understand the skinners that want to make a few bucks for their work, but i think in the long run, they are just cutting off the branch they are sitting on. [/quote] Totally agree they should charge for their work, but when they average between $6-$12 it can get expensive - as WindowBlinds

71 Replies 283,133 Views

I use to subscribe to OD years ago when I was in I.T. and I just loved it - the unique styling; unlimited themes; DesktopX; ObjectDock; WindowBlinds; CursorFX; Gadgets... Thought I would re-visit now I'm working from home again, and it seems only a shadow of what it was: DesktopX scrapped; many of the Gadgets just old and buggy; WindowBlinds Styles individually costly... I could go on Compared with the versatility of what it used to be, I think Stardock should - at lea

71 Replies 283,133 Views