moltobenny

Woo! Thanks SD!

I got my big ol' "LIKES FALLEN ENCHANTRESS" spreadsheet here. I am going to go ahead and pencil Valentine82 into the ol' "No" column. Moving on?

If you say "bland and boring" one more time... Jesus. Anyway, you'd make your points better without all the flailing hyperbole and hysteria. But I guess that would take the fun out of it.

[quote who="zonk1000" reply="69" id="3270425"] FE is a great place to build a fantasy franchise on. There's a lot of places the game can go from here. But shouldn't this game stand by itself? I think FE should have 'went places' from WoM but it really didn't go that far.[/quote] I think a large majority of the people who bought the game would say it does stand by itself, quite well.

Valentine82's posts are bland and boring.

Wow. Great post! I will say that for most of the past couple years I've been ensconced in hardcore online MP RTS play, and that's why I love this game so much. It's nice to sit back, relax and have fun building your own story for a change instead of making sure your build order is optimized. :)

That dude sure don't like this game!

This is the definitely the greatest thread on the internet right now, for introducing the words "baggy" and "bagginess" to describe games. I was going through my List of Games I Love looking for patterns, and couldn't find one. For action/arcade (Asteroids) and RTS (StarCraft II) I like 'em as lean as possible. For TBS and adventure (FE, Civ, etc.) I likes 'em baggy!! Great discussion.

Hello! I played GalCiv for ten billion hours! I loved Stardock! Then War of Magic came out and the press was so bad I got scared away, and sort of felt I'd lost a friend. Then (you may have heard) Fallen Enchantress came out! The reviews were good! Could I regain my old friend? DARE I JUMP BACK INTO THE POOL? My caveats are that this is my first game, and I'm only three or four hours into it, and I still don't have a REAL strong