I have mixed feelings about this. It seems like all the existing bugs we have will be around for 3 weeks to a month. But when they get back to it then there will be some additional enhancement. I guess I got spoiled when in times past there would be one or more major bug updates within the a week or so after release. It sounds like they have a lot in the hopper and are spread thin which is to be expected, better that than not busy creating future revenue streams. Bottom line,
sgsmitty
Has anyone who has had this problem been able to resolve it? Thanks
It would be nice if the resume function actually worked on the downloads, it would save you guys some bandwidth. I have been trying to download the movie pack, I've tried all three servers How do you choose different servers within stardock central? Thanks
I have same issue. Checked SDC this morning, just to see if any updates, and received the error. Not an issue on our part, rather there is something jacked with SDC.
Ah, says it plainly in the history.txt file. Will not work with previous saved games. Cool, moving along.
Does anyone want to know more concerning the fact that GalCiv2 blows chunks when I tried to load a save game after the most recent update? If so, let me know what to send. Otherwise, it is beta so this happens.
I know it must be around somewhere.... Is there a list of keyboard hot keys and/or mouse actions (for 3D display) out here? Thanks
Wow, the first sane anti-Bush response I have read on Joe User today. Maybe things can be healed.
Should Bush listen or care for Europes concern? No. He is a US president.
Terror. War. Evil dooers, etc. A major reason why I voted for him is the above aspects.
The latest from Fox news http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137017,00.html indicates the majority of material was removed, by us. But just suppose that the material was stolen after the troops were there. I fail to see how that is Bush's fault.
So "A bit of the left" using your thinking it seems you think the "poor" should have received a higher percentage back because they are "poor"? Such thinking I think would lead people to live lethargic lives depending upon others to support them while they do the minimal amount necessary for themselves. What incentive is there to work harder/smarter to better your lot in live if the government is going to come along and redistribute the
I suppose you were for those same tax breaks on that one group? spoken like a true person without an education on the issue. The tax break that everyone received was based upon how much you put in. Did you pay taxes? Did you get a refund? <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#F
What I am surprised about is that so many people were either surprised that she was not singing live or upset about it. Modern music is so complex, involving multiple instruments, sounds, vocals, etc. that it is next to impossible to recreate live what they achieve in the studio with multiple track recording equipment.
The senator's answer to the question about abortion particularly impressed me. I liked the way he explained that, even though he was against abortion on religious grounds, as a legislator he had a duty to make law for everyone, whether or not they shared his religious beliefs. Good point, well made. He ended his thoughts on the s
Kerry supports abortion. Abortion is murder. Kerry is wrong for the unborn. Enough said.
well, the game is unproven so who can say. I hope it is wrong, wrong, wrong.
well, the game is unproven so who can say. I hope it is wrong, wrong, wrong.
What do you call a genetic condition that causes humans to be attracted to members of the same sex? I could care less about the sexual preferences of someone but it is abnormal by definition (affects less than 5% of the population). Bold statement, but true. May not be a sickness, but certainly abnor