ItWasRhetorical

ItWasRhetorical

Joined Member # 4641447
0 Posts 0 Replies 282 Reputation

[quote who="Quesocito" reply="38" id="3670239"] Quoting ItWasRhetorical, reply 37 Oh I know there are bigger issues [e digicons]:P[/e] . And it depends what navy you ask; the term is also used for a warship armoured like a battleship but carrying cruiser armament and speed, intended to serve as a screening wars

42 Replies 267,096 Views

Oh I know there are bigger issues :P. And it depends what navy you ask; the term is also used for a warship armoured like a battleship but carrying cruiser armament and speed, intended to serve as a screening warship that could survive in the heat of battle. I've missed that bit of news; what buff are they getting?

42 Replies 267,096 Views

[quote who="jjandrah" reply="30" id="3669516"] Fast attack units are a welcome addition. Consider a T3 fast attack dreadnought as well, intended to anchor an army of these. Think Antorak Marauder. Permanent radar jamming as a unit is too hard of a counter to artillery. Alternatives: Radar jamming is a unit active ability, not passive. Balance can be around cooldown, duration. <

42 Replies 267,096 Views