Thanks to both of you for the replies. Restarted the machine and everything works fine now. Seems like a Windows issue.
ogman
Windows Version # is 1903 (Build 18362.657). Start 10 ver. 1.8. Current Style - Diamond I have Windows set to autohide the taskbar. However, with Windowblinds the taskbar does not autohide. This is causing a problem with blocking buttons in programs. Is it not possible to autohide the taskbar using Windowblinds?
Never could download that file, but I uninstalled everything and reinstalled. Works now. Thanks for the help.
Hello and thanks for the replay. Windows Version # is 1903 (Build 18362.657). Start 10 ver. 1.8. Tried using Edge to download the file and turned off antivirus/firewall. Didn't work.
When I open Start 10 I get a box that will not maximize. Options are available, but there is no way to apply anything. Nothing ever happens to the Start menu. How do I fix this? Tried to download the purge file, but the link seems dead. I also saw something about tablet mode sometimes causing problems. I sometimes use tablet mode on my machine. Does this somehow mess up Start 10 permanently?
VladStudio, WC, DeviantArt...pretty much in that order.
Even though I'm a subscriber, I myself this morning was introduced with ads and download limitations as well. I had the same experience last week. I emailed support and received a prompt reply, but the problem had fixed itself a shortly before that. Patience is mandatory!
And people complain about the response time of Stardock why? LMAO! Great comment!
"than telling users that I don't want them to ever purchase our software again?" They wouldn't listen to you anyway and I know, because I just keep buyin' it. I think you should spend lots of time in here. I think the honesty is refreshing, but then I'm a big fan of House and Atlas Shrugged.
Po' Smedley, starkers - You and I have vastly different views of the world, and for that I find myself extremely grateful. I won't drag out personal history issues with you, as I don't think this is the appropriate place. However it may interest you to know that I have a degree in psychology. I mention that only because you seem to think you have a monopoly on understanding of the human psyche. A worldview that envisions addicts, perverts, and other assorted evil arou
Been using older WB themes, circa 2002-2001, from Mercury, Klaatu Berada, Dangeruss, and contemporaries. MAN, those folks were innovative! Lots of extra buttons and surprises thrown in. We could learn a lot from those real pioneers. Check out Heavy Metal by Dangeruss, running on WB5.5(build 92 X 86)...Now THAT'S "back in the day"! Every time I see that skinhit avatar, it cracks me up! <b
free samples would be better Now you're talkin'!
Your statistics are highly misleading, given the difference in size between the sites. Lets look at it another way:- WC has a post for every 1.7 submissions DA has a post for every 26.1 submissions Statistics can say whatever you want them to
To those who saw nothing wrong with the SS - hypothetically, if you had a 14 -15 yo daughter who attracted the attentions of men twice her age, and the authorities refused to act, forbade you to intervene, would you still be so calm & accepting of images that are intended to 'portray' young girls in provocative poses for the titillation of dirty old men? Maybe the model is now 24 - 25, but the intent is to portray her as a girl in her very
Bushman - Didn't get your email, so I sent you one. Lookin' forward to hearing from you.
Bushman said: 'I did read it ogman, and you are really full of it. There is this saying ogman "Assumtion is the Mother of all Fuck Ups"' I realize that the people who left are your friends and it's admirable that you come to their defense. However, anyone reading that thread with anything other than completely biased eyes can see what was said that brought on Brad's reaction. Trying to insult me will not change that fact.
Bushman - Hey, thanks for quoting that, since I can now see I made a grammatical error. they was = they were.
Sorry Brad, but I have to agree that the image of that girl is offensive, at least to me. There is absolutely no reason to use children in images that portray them in and indecent manner such as this. That is not an adult, it is no more than a 9-12 year old child to me, and I would need someone to prove to me otherwise. Please read the original thread. All of the info you need is there.
Can some one show me where this threat was, said or written? You could go back and read the original thread. By the way, please don't come back with, "Well I didn't see a threat, those words were never used" The threats are there, they was implied (fairly blatantly) and understood as the author(s) intended. However, they did not get the reaction they hoped for.
In response to Bushman: "You may own this site but it's the people that support this site that keep it up and going." I think that's a commonly held misconception on the internet. In fact, the people are here because the site is here. Without any segment of those people, if the site is still a well run, good quality site, more people will come in to replace the ones who left. The fact is that Brad had no choice. Some people decided to try and impose their will upon th
In response to Fairyy~ "I just sit here in awe at all the ass kissing posts agreeing with Frogboy. I wonder if he took the opposite point of view if we would see an about face of opinions." Well, if we follow your playground logic, then if he held the opposite opinion then you would be kissing his ass. I'm sure you meant to demean others with that comment, but let me suggest that you demean yourself buy showing that you simply cannot stand the idea of not getting your
In response to vStyler: "middle aged decent folks" Oh, so if I'm middle-aged and disagree with you or your friends that would make me? What the heck has age got to do with it? How is threatening to leave if you don't get your way and indication of middle-age OR decency? Sounds more to me like a lost 6 year old taking their ball home because the other children wouldn't let them have their way. "this site and its moderators held themselves to a higher standard"
"This site is suppose to be for everyone and if one person is offended it should be respected and removed." quote from the original thread That is the most ridiculous concept I have ever heard of and one that is tossed around way to much. If every place/site/country/whatever was run that way there would be nothing...well...nothing. Imagine if all it took was one offended person to remove a something? Imagine something that you value being removed from a place where you va
The docklet does not function, does not update. I would like to remove it from the dock. How can I do this? Thanks
Ok, simpler question. The weather docklet doesn't work, so how can it be removed?