I cannot be absolutely certain about this but I think I remember hearing that PSP8 does not support saving .tga format at a high enough bit depth. Perhaps someone else hear can confirm or deny this. I hope, in this instance I am wrong! I love PSP and would never bad mouth it intentionally.
Raithe
Perhaps he meant Component Manager and Stardock Central.
I believe Bakerstreet is bang on with this one. While making .exe's from DX would be something many(including myself) would enjoy, can spending the money for this feature honestly be justified for an average user or even a power-user. Think about it for just one minute, how many objects could you make to give to how many family members and friends that would be worth even say just $100 for an upgrade as previously suggested? I believe that the $499 price (when professional sof
I think that Bakerstreet is right and that a so called power-user may actually become a power-abuser if a $130 version is generated. I understand that Stardock is a company that believes more in its custumers than its profit margin, and they should be commended for it, but I think this will only lead to an ill-fated end for everyone.
There have been a number of threads on this, I think you should look them up. But probably the easiest answer would simply be to tell you to look in the directory that holds the bootskin program - there is a text file that lets you know all that need to make one.
Jafo, That was my point - the average joe will just purchase the standard size monitor that comes with a computer but an artist or power-user has a need and will purchase as much as he or she can to be more productive. Kona, Listen to Aleatoric, perhaps he says it the best. Damn it always seems that when I say something its never quite clear enough! Chalk it up to my
Oh Jafo, not Mitsubishi! I cringe when I hear Mitsubishi, but thats another story, you don't find the 1024x768 too over exagerated on that 19"? Who said anything about being bigger for the sake of it - I am sure that you didn't buy that 19" because it came standard with your computer? When I purchased my 19" it was with one thing in mind - more viewing area! In fact, over the past year I have come to see that purchasing ever growing monitors sizes is futile! Its become my perso
I must admit that I too am comfused by his decision, even bad comments are a good thing - they help us to improve upon our own work. One should never give into dispare by unwelcome criticism! I have seen the skin and personaly feel that the skin should have at least been rated at 9. It shows tremendous originality and style! If this person wishes to leave then so be it, but when an artist joins are ranks we are enlighted and when one is lost we are diminished! I truly hope that this artist chang
Yeah - its much easier, just a couple of click and no worries.
From my own personal experience there are really only two kinds of users: 1) The average joe who purchases a computer with all the standard equipment in one neat little bundle at the store and never really alters anything on it other than to add software (video games, office software, etc). 2) The artist and/or power-user who purchases as much state of the art equipment(monitor, memory, hard drive) as his or her budget will allow. Now the last two+ years have made 17"
What a crock! When I was teenager, and wanted to further my understanding of man, the first thing I did was study all the major religions (Wicca included!). And if there is one commonality that all of them share, its a higher form of morality and code of ethics to which to live by (Wicca included!). The major problem with most religions however, is that fact many practitioners believe their religion is the ONLY religion and anyone who follows another religion is blasphemus! Now I don't have an a
This issue has alot to be said. CRT and LCD screen both have good and bad things about them. First off lets point out a few definitions here, there are CRT screens which are much like TVs, then there are their cousins the Flat screens which are still CRTs but are based on Sony's Trinitron Technology, giving you a totally flat screen - hence the name. Then there are the Flat Panels, now flat panels are often referred to as LCD screens, but this is not always the case since Plasma screens also fit
Did you save your edited icon as a seperate file or did you save it over the original icon file that your friend gave you?
I don't know about OD, but (and this may be a stupid question) when was the last time you updated you video driver?
Some of what I said still holds true on this subject though. Windows is most likely the culprit, its probably shrinking the image to the size allocated for cursors. [Message Edited]
Ah crap you said cursors - sorry my stupidity - I was reading another thread then hit this one.
Maybe I better explain how icons work in order to give you the best advice. Lets use the standard windows folder icon as an example. This icon is a package of several icons images, each vary in size and bit depth. Now these sizes range from 48X48 to as small as 16X16 pixels and contain in upwards of 16 million plus colors to as little as 16 colors, with XP that even includes versions that possess alpha-blending. You could technically create your own in even the simplist program such as
I think you better elaberate further on this one. Icons are shrunk by windows itself, to be used for different locations. 48X48 used for drive and folder icons. 32X32 for desktop icons. 16X16 for explore tree and start menu icons. Are you talking about DX icons?
I like the image Style, really I do and I hope this isn't too presumptuous of me but, I think the image might work more for you if you were to begin by rotating it 180 degrees. Then for the title screen, trace the curves of the 2 points on either side down towards the new bottom and make it end in an upward arch. This would give you an oval space which you can then follow Brainiac idea. Also, I think the screen would look nice with a 1 pixel inner bevel. I don't know if you can picture
I must say, your quest does hit me with a measure of curiosity. I know you mentioned CIA and the movie Final Fantasy, what do you have in mind to merge these two styles, if that is of course what you are doing? And what of that do you intend to bring into DX?
Oh and Stockholm, seriously, I think there is some kind of medication you can take for that, but I am not a doctor!
I don't know how I did it but I completely overlooked the fact that it read object dock, I guess I was too hung up on icons. That certainly changes things! I don't know of many in PNG format that are available for you, but, if you really want them, my only advice would be that said by so many others, make your own. Axialis makes a great icon generator capable of icon sizes up 128X128 tha
Are you sure you really want to use PNG icons. PNG takes up more time to process and require windows to load the PNG process handler, which also take more time. If you ask me windows is slow enough, even with a top of the line machine.
Some people may give me a beat down for what I am about to say, but hey, what the heck - why not. In truth there is no right answer. Both have very good points for or against them. Many graphic artists and the like, usually prefer Macs while cgi animators for film usually use PCs. I myself have owned both plus a couple of others of old times. Often, those who get started on one will never accept the other and vice versa. If you believe that you will like a Mac then by all means get one, but unde
"Print Screen" button to take full screen shot with everything in it. "Alt" and "Print Screen" button together to take shot of active window only.