"For what it's worth, Elemental tries hard to be the spiritual successor of a fantastic turn-based strategy game cum RPG called Master of Magic ." I pulled this quote from the review and I don't know what this statement means. Can anyone enlighten me? Is it an editing flaw?
Maybe it is just me, but I don't like to read reviews that are constantly comparing X to Y. I mean review the game. I also detected a bit of "friction" due to the past relationship between Brad and Tom, a sort of creative difference. This is not GalCiv, SC2, MoM..etc. Yes Elemental is strat game and falls in the same category of games, however it is different from the rest.
So what you have displayed is that your are passionate and wear your heart on a sleeve. I wonder how all of us would react after three plus years of development, and someone is taking potshots at your product. I mean the game has been out for 48 plus hours and they have been working tirelessly to fix the problems. I can understand where you are coming from and know that most of the community supports you all. Keep up the good work and don't let the naysayers get to you
Thanks for the update! The campaign is now worth playing for us "newbies" and provides a better introduction to the game. I thought you guys said you were taking a few days off?
Maybe you have to bring him any three stones between the hours of three and midnight??[e digicons]O:)[/e] Or maybe you have to be "stoned" three times by midnight.... This seems like an episode out of Monty Python.