Scoutdog

Banned for not finishing your thought and...............

Banned for overprotectiveness. How is the developed world supposed to face it's demons if they won't even mention them?

Banned for wanting to prevent relevant chains.

Banned for encouraging edit ryats. It's the death camps next, I tells ya'll!!!!

Banned because the paradox is not my ban. The paradox is my reason for banning.

Granted. And it doesn't become intelligent and ttake over the world. But some loonie who's watched too many "Terminator" movies thinks it has, and smashes it with a wooden club. I wish I could beat the class 2 race in Jak 2 just 1.033 seconds faster......

You should ban yourself for bannig self-banning. Banned for a paradox.

[quote]Where is it bad? where is it excessive and sadism??[/quote]Bad is an Americans-first mentality that treats foreign nationals as sub-human. Excessive is bombing a gasoline truck in the middle of a village on the off chance that the Taliban might get ahold of it. Sadism is threatening to bore a hole in a detainee's skull with a power drill. It's been in all the papers (well, not the Murdoch ones)(can't type tonight)..... [quote]Am I superman? can I save everyone? no, can i do som

Banned for pushing relevancy. It's the death camps next, I tells ya!!!!!!!!

[quote]Anyone wearing a uniform is a target.[/quote]Exactly. [quote]You have no clue what this world would be like without soldiers. SOMEONE has TO DO IT.[/quote]Yes, but that doesn't mean someone has to do it badly and with excessive force and sadism. [quote]And I personally believe Id rather die doing something I enjoy and believe in then die thanks to some jackass driving drunk on the highway.[/quote]So you enjoy killing and destruction. Th

Banned for relevant worldveiws. This is supposed to be the internet for crying out loud!!!!!

Banning banned.

Banned for wnating to write in bad grammar. We can't have that now, can we?

Banned for disrupting traditional man-on-bird marriage. It's the death camps next, I tells ya!

Banned for pushing pills.

[quote]the us's military role up until these last two wars and last two presidents. was to end the fighting as quickly as possible.[/quote]You seem to forget the mess that was Vietnam. Or are they still not calling that a "war"? Regarding Rez and A86, in guerilla warfare situations such as Iraq and Afghanistan combat positions do not necessarily equate to the highest-risk areas: if anything convoy drivers and other "logistical" people are more vulnerable, since they

Banned for causing seizures. That's just wrong.

Well, that didn't last long........... In any event, I agree that economic pressures play a large role in military recruiting, however, I have to say that you would have to be pretty desperate for strong-liklihood-of-painful-death-or-lifelong-maiming to be a "smart" option for your career. And while I agree that you need some sort of armed force to keep people from obliterating one another, there's no real reason that said force has to be unnecessarily brutal

I see where you're coming from. But I'm reasonably sure others won't. Best to just drop it before the tread gets locked due to flamewars.

This is very good news for us modders, and it should help quite the endless damage-types debate........ once we get things in our hot little hands, I'll begin taking requests for new damage systems from those of you who care about that sort of thing.....

Banned for banning a V. Curse you 5th Colony!!!!!

Granted. 666. I wish Henry David Thoreau had just DIED as a kid so I wouldn't have to write this horrible ESSAY on him.

Banned for encouraging banning in a ban game. It's the death cams next, I tells ye!!

Banned for finding him by following the sound of his bans.

Banned for witing for him to resume his "crushing" monologues.