MGiff, you don't think NVidea can match Voodoo??? Are you serious? Voodoo cards were great in their day, but they are (now) several generations behind the times, 3dfx just couldn't keep up with nVidea. They lost the tech battle. Simple as that.
Paul Doland
You'll have to add me to the list of doom-sayers. I can agree to a point that a lot of people are more intellegent than schools are teaching them to be. Which is really a whole 'nuther topic, but schools clearly need to be massively revamped. That said, I think there really is only so much "knowledge work" to be done, or at least marketable, regardless of how smart people are. For example, how many people can make a living doing skins, even if everybody had Object Desktop? Of course
Just my $0.02. I would love to see StarDock officially state that WB 3.5 is the last version for Win 9x. Of course that is easy for me to say, I only use XP and 2000. (XP at home, 2000 at the office.) But it's 2003. Windows 2000 is 3 years old, and XP is over a year old. Its time to retire 9x. (Of course, it was time to retire 9x the day they were released... )
By the way, I believe that iRider works with most pop-up blocker utilities. So, while I find iRider's default behavior for popups satisfactory, but for those that don't, go ahead and use a popup blocker.
I started a thread in the Message Board about alternative browsers, and mentioned iRider. Since it doesn't do skinning, I didn't think that it was a suitable topic for the news section on this site. But, since it is here, well, I love iRider, and paid for it. But I think $30 is a trivial amount of money for a good product, even if good products are also available for free. I personally found that adding a new page for every single navigation to be way too much, which is the default.
Just curious, any news on any older OSes, like 9X? Personally, it wouldn't bother me if Stardock stops WindowBlinds at 3.5 for Windows 9X, but I have no idea if that is their plan or not.
??? Why must everything depend on Stardock??? That's a very strange comment to me... Although Microsoft is indeed seeing that customizing and personalizing computers is becoming popular, and they adding more and more such features to the OS with every new release. Even so, there is only so much that one would reasonably expect them to do. Microsoft is a mass marketer. They don't try to satisfy every possible niche. The kinds of things that Object Desktop does is is the kind of nic
I was focusing on browsers that are IE based. But you are correct that those are other options. And of course Opera.
Oh, one of the things I forgot to mention, what about a section here for skins for the skinable alternative browsers?
I notice that the news item about Phase Out has been pulled off the news list, I assume because of the controversy about the default skin being a ripoff of Abaracadabara. But, it was via that incident that I learned about the world of skinable makovers for IE. At first, I didn't think much of it, after all, WebBlinds can do that, right? Well, I've since discovered that there are lots of alternative browsers that really add good functionality. I particularly am fond of tabbed browsing
I did not say that Paul Doland sucks!!! This site seems to subsititue your own name when you type slash M E.
Citizen Wulfn1 complains that people of limited resources won't be supported anymore. Well, nobody can take away the products you have! If you want to keep using what you got, that's just fine. But I've got a question - are you expecting MS to release a never version of Plus! 98? Fat chance. But you expect Stardock to release new versions of OD for 98? Citizen C²zero says that 98 was a great OS for its time. Um, no, it wasn't. Though OS/2 never reached critical mass, it was a far