Carighan

Carighan

Joined Member # 3092090
0 Posts 3 Replies 45 Reputation

Am I alone in feeling that instead of adding 1 new cap each, the existing caps should have been revisiting. I feel like there aren't enough roles in a race to warrant 6 caps unless I get, say, a merchant cap ship, or a diplomatic cap ship, or a starbase builder cap. Actually, that all sounds reasonable, gimme. :D

22 Replies 70,467 Views

Taking a queue from other games (largely Homeworld), Corvettes would carry bigger weapons than strikecraft but be slow enough for "normal" guns (not AA guns) to hit them. In other words while nearly as cheap as strikecraft, they'd be too big to really [u]be[/u] strikecraft. Translated in SoaSE terms, we could have Corvettes as a build option on Carriers / Caps / Bases, their damage being substantially higher than Strikecraft, and being Bomber and Fighter combined of

23 Replies 13,376 Views

Hrm. Maybe expand animosity so it's targetted at an enemy + radius, and the ship specifically targetted deals X% less damage to the Radiance? Although that'd heavily unbalance early Cap + fleet vs Cap + fleet fights. Maybe change Detonate Antimatter to an active ability which prevents the ship from taking more than X damage per second, but cuts own DPS by Y? That way your Radiance can taunt a group of ships, turn the tank buff on, and independent of how many shi

166 Replies 421,193 Views

[quote who="Smith89" reply="2" id="3152805"]I think everyone agrees that it is broken right now problem is how to fix it without breaking the back of the player who0's titan was destroyed. [/quote] I'd be curious why that would be a problem? If at all, it'd indicate Titans are too cheap and too weak. I mean it's a [u]Titan[/u]. You pool a gargantuan amount of resources into a ship which is stronger than multiple caps combined. But if y

20 Replies 5,182 Views

The Coronata, a bit like the Ankylon, is a strong army-supporter. Suppression Aura coupled with some Corvette debuffs + Shield Projection makes your army lasts for ages. Excess Antimatter you can burn off either with Subjugation (if they ever get it properly debugged) or Unity Mass, I'd mostly make this depend on whether you are blanketing into small ships, or need to snipe out specific utility ships quickly. It's weak, yes. As army support it's very powerful howev

49 Replies 154,265 Views

The Eradica is supremely powerful as far as I tested it so far. It doesn't help that even [u]should[/u] you destroy it, it'll just destroy you in turn in most scenarios. So at best you can force a stalemate.

49 Replies 154,265 Views

The idea of making battleships good against [u]all[/u] enemies, including strikecraft, is quite interesting. This'd make them the default choice when you need combat power since they will never be a bad choice at all. Although you can still argue Carriers can also be anti-strikecraft, they can't switch between their "modes" quickly.

166 Replies 421,193 Views

Maybe we just need to rethink how carrier caps work? They are supposed to distinguish themselves due to their huge number of strikecraft, right? [u]Why[/u] do they have 3 full abilities like other capitals, then, instead of say, two of their abilities being passive, one increasing the number of squadrons hosted by 1 per rank (and reducing the base numbers accordingly), the other improving the replacement speed but eating up antimatter when replacing strikecraft? <p

166 Replies 421,193 Views

Am I the only one who thinks that the new cap ships are entirely unnecessary? Sure some of their abilities are nice, but it's stuff I'd rather see on other capships, replacing marginal or underused abilities there. I mean we just got close to having some synergy between the other caps, the carrier-"problem" remains, and now we're adding new ones? It just seems to be throwing fuel onto a blazing fire. :S

33 Replies 28,874 Views

To be honest, I don't see it as an AI issue. If I could royally piss you off chaining Armistice, very likely making you misjudge other areas due to the rage I caused, I'd go for it. Sure. Best type of warfare, winning without even shooting.

13 Replies 17,422 Views

My GF bought this when it came out, I withheld my judgement until I saw her play it. We're both huge MoM fans and probably wrongly hyped us up about it being somewhat of an inofficial replacement. So far I agree a lot with the Shacknews review. The whole feature creep makes AoW: SM a more interesting MoM-replacement not because it's a good MoM-clone or even feels similar to play, but entirely because it doesn't feel stuffed with things no one needs.

57 Replies 121,477 Views

[quote who="TheProgress" reply="1" id="2720405"]http://fidgit.com/archives/2010/08/elemental_in_a_world_of_dragon.php Although review is apparently confused in the ways of math: 5 * 1.25 * 1.5 = 9.37 rounded up = 9.4[/quote] While mathmatically sound, it is very very confusing to the user however. If you have two things which say they give 20% bonuses, you would inherently assume you get a 40% (additive) bon

228 Replies 533,283 Views

In addition, be advised that autocast Shield Projection is probably the worst of automation AI in SoaSE, so you should never ever use that. This led me to single-hotkey my Guardians in larger fleets so I can quickly tab through the bunch of them to position/fire their projectors. As Darvin said, well-positions + supported by a Progenitor your only real weakness is to keep disabling powers off the Progenitor - your fleet is basically invulnerable. Phase Missiles may disagree with you t

13 Replies 5,224 Views

[quote]If they just reduced their turn rate like 50-100%, they have an achilies heal. [/quote] Not a bad idea. Maybe have them have an ability, "Weapon Mode", which they have to trigger first. Takes say 15 seconds, and it takes another 15s (nonmoving, static) to turn it off again. And while Weapon Mode is engaged, weapons work but turnrate is down 50% and speed is down 50%.

58 Replies 24,196 Views

The problem I mean with overall strategy is that there is just too much predictability in our games. And usually, as soon as a game developer adds unpredictability, forcing sides in a battle to make strategic (not tactical!) adjustments to their setup, the whining starts that the game relies too much on luck. (no joke :S ) Currently you know the enemy can attack by pattern X, Y or Z. You counter them with X1, Y2 or Z1, respectively. There's no "strategy" in that unless you

104 Replies 66,080 Views

[quote]Playing RTS games online has always been a load of horse shit. 'Strategy' is a myth and really has no bearing at all on how "RTS" games are played online.[/quote] Due to their nature, RTS games are more RTT (tactics) games. Even in games like Supreme Commander or SoaSE, "strategy" merely means knowing a build order and which buttons to press. The strategic impact of any larger decisions is minimal, as there is always "the" strategy.

104 Replies 66,080 Views

[quote]They fixed the crystal rush but the cure is worse than the disease. the 1.03 market effectively discounts resources by 1000s of credits for heavy early buyers. Hello TEC and goodbye game balance![/quote] TBH... didn't TEC need it? Now that Javelin's are essentially flying paper airplanes, they really don't bring much to the table anymore past their humongous credit-printing capabilities.

190 Replies 203,903 Views

[quote]In short : is someone who have pirated Civ IV less likely to buy GalCiv 2? If it is the case, then piracy could only be tackled by a industry-wide action, which (as a player/buyer) I am afraid of.[/quote] I'd divide into three types of pirates there: There's the type which just pirates everything, out of the box, despite having resources to buy at least a part of them. These can largely not be converted, though with really really really strict copy protection y

254 Replies 1,050,409 Views

My only real answer would be Progenitor + Halcyon (ideally x2) on Advent. Shield Aura + Malice + LOTS of strikecraft. But then that's way too slow to counter early LRM attacks.

58 Replies 24,196 Views

[quote]You guys go into this great detail about your fleets... All I do not even worry about adding ships in! With Advent 3 Halcyon Carriers and 15 Aeria Dron Hosts can kill just about anything with waves of fighters, including the Flacks. I clear Pirate bases with ease using the fleet listed above. Of course my units are all upgraded. I research up pretty quick.[/quote] That should (and probably would) lose to an equal fleet of Def Vessels, unless you completely out-tech the oppone

10 Replies 6,817 Views

[quote]Just out of morbid curiosity, is there any place in this genre for people who don't micro the daylights out of everything?[/quote] Statistically speaking yes. Actually speaking... no. The problem is that there's "gaming", and there's "competitive gaming". The soon you play2win, you want to micro. Even in TBS games you micro, only there everyone does it, automatically. You might click on auto-combat at times but tbh you only do that if you're 100% sure you'll win

119 Replies 46,885 Views

Depends on what you play. As Advent I'd bring Progenitor + Rapture, and a mix of my own HCs and Illums. Then have the HCs stop him, fly in the Progenitor, use Malice, shield up the HCs with the aura (this makes your HCs nearly equal to his despite lower numbers), and then go depending on what he does. If he focuses on your HCs, blast him to shreds with the Illums + Malice. If he chases the Illums, kite him while killing his HCs one by one with yours. And i

28 Replies 20,874 Views