ZeratulTheDT

[quote who="rossanderson48" reply="164" id="2731747"] Quoting ZeratulTheDT, reply 161Eh, I could play through the entire single player of ETW on release with little difficulty. Obviously, that is just my experience. Also, ETW is a lot prettier than this game, and had a much more cohesive and useful veterancy system (see my post above regarding sovereign veterancy). Additionally upon release ETW's multiplayer was functional, so IMHO it wasn't "way buggier" than this game.

Eh, I could play through the entire single player of ETW on release with little difficulty. Obviously, that is just my experience. Also, ETW is a lot prettier than this game, and had a much more cohesive and useful veterancy system (see my post above regarding sovereign veterancy). Additionally upon release ETW's multiplayer was functional, so IMHO it wasn't "way buggier" than this game.

I hate to say this, but I agree 100% with PCGamer. Let me preface this by saying I love Stardock and REALLY wanted to like this game. As a long time beta tester and gamer (over ten years with each) it's pretty clear that this game was not ready for its release. You can't release a title with disabled online multiplayer and buggy single player and expect favorable reviews. In the campaign, I'm currently trapped in Act 6, looking for a survivor who (I think) is in a desert nowhere to be