None of you are still providing any ideas or proof of why EA is hurting Bioware. Or proving that EA is making decisions for Bioware that are bad. EA wants every game coming out of Bioware to be in the 90s. EA knows Bioware is one of if not their best studio. What I'm saying is you seem to be providing EA as an excuse for decisions out of Bioware that you don't like. I for one think the changes to Dragon Age 2 are good. Dragon Age felt like an antiquated game next to Mass Effect 2.
Polynomial
I'm going to shamelessly bump this again. I really think it would add something to the game.
Obvious is obvious.
Some sort of online persistant world with player diplomacy, borders and so on would be amazing.
I think it just streamlines managing empires and all =P
Just like that. I'd really like to see that.
I loved how Advance Wars did this. It highlighted the spots a unit could go to It recognized terrain and such do show you where you could gand could not go. I cannot find a picture of this but does anyone else know what I'm talking about?
I'll admit it, I'm a multiplayer guy. Whenever I see a turn based strategy I immediately look away. I love the Advance Wars series and that is about it. The only reason I'm giving this game a look is the fact its being developed by Stardock internally. Even when Frogboy says its single player centric, the quality of the single player aspect should transfer over to multiplayer just fine. So the "persistant world". I hope its not going to be something like Demigod where its just measure