Aygis

Support for the userfront ;) +1 [we do this for you A.I.]

Groups, parties etc seem unbalanced . My preference would be to have them removed from the game entirely or to just have the size of a stack dictated by the quality of the equipment of the stack. That is, a lightly armed militia group would have 9 members but a fully armed squad with all the bells and whistles would have say 6 members. The game would decide this through an algorithm. Or... Allow the existing squads to upgrade to Companies etc. My preference though would be to

+1

+1 It would feel more in line with the other uses if you must spend it to generate an effect. Aka: Give 50 Influence-Point to a faction – gain +x Relation for y turns…

Yes, I guess it would need too much rebalancing at this stage, but thanxs for your consideration J --- @boatman Ah, but that is not artificial stone, paper, scissors – aka give units a bonus against a specific other unit. It flows more naturally. First of all, champions are indeed just like other units (and that may be a problem of its own) in their basic mechanisms (HP, Level) the just have special “traits”. My Idea is to i

Please consider to treat all men in a unit truly as singular entities, maybe this would allow finding an easier balance between champions and soldiers. Par example, a strong armoured Hero that fights against 15 Soldiers (3 units). Currently he doesn’t need support troops. With each hit he kills maybe 3-4 Soldiers and the fight is over in 4-5 rounds. Fast enough for your taste, but than again you just used one hero. If you want to counter said hero your sol

:) I know Mr. Pocus, even without the Fr Greetings!

@ not moving This happens when there is an obstacle on a road / or the path ? - like an outpost, or an alien unit - conflict of interest I guess :)

The "snapping back" can by turned off in the options...

Overall, I like what’s in the game so far. I voted for Tactical Battles but only because I think changes in this part would need more man-hours than ever other part in that I’m missing something. - Some kind of line of sight mechanism. Or at least tiles that give a 25% or 50% protection against Archer and Damage-spells. - Archers (and possible Mages) that are moving before they shoot should get a heavy reduction to their accuracy (le

Hi Limit the hero units that can join together into an army. In the beginning just two heroes plus some mundane troops, if you want. Then, each tier of research in "hero-gathering-whatsoever" gives you not only more powerfull ones but also let an additional hero join an army(group). This would reduce doom-stacks in the beginning (the must level separatly - more stacks - and with mundane support). In mid-game the AI can simple research and recrut level 9 heroes - it has must not bother

1. Drastic shifts in numbers My Suggestions were: https://forums.elementalgame.com/395049 Change for the 1D: Split it in a fix number and a variable one, D5…0-5 0 is a botch, max D is +50% (round up) D10 becomes 5+D5 (6-10, max 13) D14 becomes 7+D7 (8-14, max 18) D15 becomes 7+D8 (8-15, max 19) etc. And on Tac

Greetings... (warning, strange english ahead...) A realm/empire/kingdom is a growing, pulsating, interacting system. Currently, for my taste, Elementals lacks somewhat in this area. I foc

Feedback/Suggestions/Wishes on 1.05 Not a wall of text - it’s not that long and has many holes in it - rather a “fence of text” As ever, I would appreciate your opinions about mine (correct my English if you want :p) The User Interface Be more romantically or bad ass cool with the design, some parts simple feel too technically. Example: The too little red x in your spell book: make instead a (wax

**but thanks to dict.leo.org... please correct my diction if you like... Had so far just little time to play, but been following the forum with joy and interest... There seams to derive one dilemma from the fact that there is only on stat for movement and number of attacks (and maybe whatever else involves “doing something”, like casting) à Action Points (AP) If you only have act