[quote who="Frogboy" reply="1" id="2713996"]I don't agree. The AI needs to make calvalry units. If the AI gets attacked or attacks you with Melee units and you have lots of archers then it deserves to get creamed and you should flame me as an incompetent AI developer. [/quote] I am always pleased when I see this line from an AI coder, seriously. Credit where it's due and whatnot. ;)
Lord_Asmodeous
Given that his screenshots he's been posting of the tactical battles seems to have actual formations involved in some way, I am hopeful (but hope should not be something to bank on) that this has been addressed in some manner. But who knows until we get it?
[quote who="Xiskio" reply="3" id="2714506"] Quoting joasoze, reply 1Yes, you are missing something. Its a beta version. There is no real AI and therefore you cannot expect an actionfilled quality game. Such comments do not help much. I am fully aware that it is a beta. [/quote] Except the comments do help though, because the fact that it's a beta may be understood, but the fact that it's a beta that only has placeholder
I think you misunderstand what Frogboy was saying in the post you linked. From what I gleaned he was saying "Is this really the first time you felt the need to bring this up?" because at the point that that thread, and this one, were made the beta build was eons beyond the internal build, and the internal build was about to go gold. It is much akin to saying "You know, that would have been a great thing to bring up about a month or two ago. . ." I
Months ago was a whole different world. That is something that a lot of people seem to not recognize.