[quote who="foxfire1234" reply="3" id="2242713"]Don't have Demigod, but I got the rest coverd! For those of us that don't make it... Please keep the tidbits comming! And for those of us that DO make it. Give good feedback so it becomes a game we can all love! I don't know how many thousands of hours I lost to playing Master of Magic or Civilization for just one more turn.... [/quote]
[quote who="Annatar11" reply="17" id="2242484"] Anyway, I would like to see a focused itemised testing list, an organised bug list and general system issues one as well time requirement expectations for the alpha. I would also like to see the selected people broken down into specific teams with weekly objectives. This is so so SD can get the maximum development benefit from the course of action at hand for the commuity. I recall we once had a similar discussion [/quote] No
[quote who="Zubaz" reply="10" id="2242254"] Quoting ckessel, reply 8Clearly, anyone that purchased Brad's original GalCiv on OS2/Warp should get an automatic entry...nice. [/quote] No doubt and dont forget Entrepreneur. Anyway, I would like to see a focused itemised testing list, an organised bug list and general system issues one as well time requirement expectations for the alpha. I would also like to see the selected people broken down into specific t
[quote who="Annatar11" reply="7" id="2236191"]You just have really bad tastes, Koscy. Also, you left out Dragon Age: Origins and The Old Republic.[/quote] I have to agree. Additionally what about STO and E:WoM? [e digicons]:fuzzy:[/e]
As I have been posting from the start of the otehr thread (and long before it) I firmly beleive that a PE would be best for this game. [e digicons]:banhammer:[/e] Karma given for the recap thread. [e digicons]k1[/e]
[quote who="Zubaz" reply="21" id="2231335"] I don't think it matters. This isn't a vote, Stardock isn't going to do whatever we vote on just because we voted on it. Our opinions count, but we don't dictate game development.This is how my family is run. Everyone has an opinion, only my wife and I have votes. [/quote] Let me guess and your vote counts as two (2) because you are more equal then her. [e digicons]:digichet:[/e] @Para - welcome to th
No real info has come out of SD the past two months mainly due to the DG project methinks.
Sadly I dont have the time I need to make the post I want to respond to questions and provide some more feedback to the current discussion so this will be a quick post.... For what it is worth this thread has started to make the gaming news cycle - pretty cool methinks. Additionally, several of the past posts were in bad form in my opinion, with a strong orientation towards flaming. Lets try to keep the thread on topic and leave that shit at the door please.
Updated [e digicons]:andrew:[/e]
@Climber - Outstanding post. I'm glad someone has the time to really spell things out. I was going to post links to different global models for people to study but I think maybe they would be to dry for most people. I firmly stand behind the demand side system. Anyway karma given. [e digicons]k1[/e]
Normally I would vehemently disagree with this concept but given this is a fantasy game, I can accept such a thing if implemented reasonably well. Allowing such an action via a magical incantation would be an acceptable method. Allowing for it to scale upward is a very practical way of doing so as well. I have also considered such a system and frankly I would want three more limitation put on it. Firstly that it should not be able to be cast for top level or elite magic items. Secondly only o
[quote who="Denryu" reply="3" id="2223322"] Quoting BoogieBac, reply 2Touching on the MOO3's 'putting AI in charge' concerns... In Elemental, no matter what system is implemented and what degree of automation/AI control is put in, rest assured that if the player overrides it, the AI will NOT re-prioritize it's own agenda the next turn. In MOO3, the main problem players had with the 'AI' was that player-set commands were often overruled y the computers logic, which we will NEVE
Call me crazy but in doing so in the end you end up with the same situation except this time you have considered the shapes as an additional factor.
@Denryu - your system is what a "pull system" would entail at a fundemental level. [e digicons]:fuzzy:[/e] Moreover with city and outpost zones of influence/control and transportation systems and upgrades coupled with national reserves and local storage capacity the tactical and strategic elements of the game are enhanced with a minimum of micro action.
[quote who="Scoutdog" reply="8" id="2222583"]True, true. It seems like everybody's canted to the right or left (but mostly right) these days. Where can a guy go to get actual NEWS anymore..... and I'm NOT talking about the "tot mom".[/quote] That quest also has a simple answer... [wait for it] . . . . . . . . The Internet silly! [e digicons]B)[/e]
@Tridus - I agree. I also had the same issue with it as well from time to time but that was part of the charm for me but this game is not a nuts-and-bolts business sim so it should be changed accordingly. In short, the learning curve was step but as I suggested earlier (and you also touched on in your post) going to pull econ functionality would alleviate all the inherent raw material network and processing issues and allow the player to focus on finished goods distro as Climber noticed
[quote who="Luckmann" reply="12" id="2221913"] Did all of us disappear and then suddently decide, despite there not being anything hugely significant in Elemental-dom, to show up at the same time? [/quote] Some of us never left. [e digicons]B)[/e] Anyway, there are a lot of nice ideas threads I would like to see some official comments on to be honest. Again we are lacking a lot of first hand info and many are concerned about picking a syst
Someone should remake this thread with the offers and the people wanting listed in the OP and show who got from whom already.
Wow had about dozen people PM for it. Sorry guys I only had one to give away. I hope you all can all get one. More importantly I hope the people getting the codes really use them. On a side note, this thread should be more organised. With a list of offers on one side and who got the code to on the other and the people still in need below them.
@Winnihym - The issue of time would be mitigated by distance from the MR and number of facilities to produce the item as well as type of travel (fast, slow -etc.). The subsequent post by Frogboy addresses this point nicely to some degree. Regarding obsolescence I think there should be a conversion function at say a "trade house" where I can decide what is obsolete and get a percentage trade in for any of that resource in my empire and I should also be able to disable any further produ
[quote who="Zipster0007" reply="22" id="2221476"]May I please have some information on that code, Spartan?[/quote] Code sent - enjoy! [e digicons]:andrew:[/e]
I have a code - someone PM me for the info.
[quote who="Luckmann" reply="5" id="2221419"] It's interesting to note that the first result that showed up when searching for "Fantasy fox" on google was to FOX News.[/quote] As it should be given that Fox operates in a fantasy world. [e digicons]:fuzzy:[/e]
I have to agree with Martok. SEIV is about most detailed one on the market today. For an across the board title you should given GC2 a try. It is really a jem. [e digicons]:andrew:[/e]
Hmmm..... Seems the consensus is shifting to "option 3". With that thought, I have a question... I really loved Capitalism 2's econ system. Has anyone else played it? I think that system would be a natural for this title.