dirtforker

[quote who="Mtn_Man" reply="108" id="2762133"] Quoting greggbert, reply 107 Firaxis can craft excellent games with a high degree of quality. That's not always true. Civilization 4 had some serious problems at launch that took several patches and expansions to completely sort out (and even then there are still some outstanding quirks that Civ fanatics grumble about to this day). Sid Meier's Railroads needed a patch to address performance

I really doubt you can possibly make this game fun for the people that don't like it now. Most reviews (with the exception of 1UP) were incredibly nice to the game based on some type of apparent respect for Stardock (so much for objectivity), although Gamespot I think has hit the mark closest so far. Well, anyway, everyone makes mistakes. It's too bad, like most I was looking forward to seeing what you could do, given that GalCivII was pretty nice. Sigh... g<

If this game doesn't get totally panned in reviews, I'll be convinced Stardock is paying them off. Not only are the bugs bad, the UI is pathetic and the game is just shabby all around. Yeah OK, I"ll wait for the patch and maybe it'll be a half-decent game in a month or two, but why every release does it have to be this way? They're shooting themselves in the foot. But, I guess when you have such low production costs (no copy protection, virtually no cinematics, terribl