In which case, your planets & starbases have sensor ranges too. This might explain such situations partly unless my interpretation of your perception of the issue is flawed.
Zyxpsilon
Fogs-of-War once explored dissapears permanently.
So... get a Boxter or Carrera, green. I'll paint the Logo.
[quote]Thou I am suprised Brad bought a Porshe.[/quote] Pors c he 911 can park or fly even if some amphibian is at the wheel?
[quote who="Fuzzy Logic" reply="30" id="2353966"]I ran over a dog yesterday. Does that count?[/quote] One cat once tried to outrun the Corolla SR5 on Thimens boulevard... when i showed up at the office later that morning, accounts payables had to wait for about 15 minutes more of trying to forget what i've just seen in a back mirror -- but, not after having braked 500 feet further and slamming a darn fist on a metal hood outa frustration for me & bad luck for the feline. A
[quote who="Mumblefratz" reply="28" id="2353958"]Hey, isn't that the Restaurant of Eternity?[/quote] [e digicons]:grin:[/e] [e digicons]4*[/e] And 10% more influence gained from a reddishly fast german car zooming by.
[quote]Are you for or against free trade?[/quote] F_O_R.
Who was it that said Lumber isn't an engine for prosperity? And that, anyone can actually provide a steady stream of plywood sheets (etc) back & forth unless somehow blocked by a "BUY American" clause. Not that both tourism industries can't collapse when the loonie flies steadily near the greenbuck value; come and visit us, now that your money is almost at par
[quote]New Orleans was a Democrat disaster;[/quote] How so... Katrina hurricane didn't have any political agenda, it struck the USA coastline and whomever managed at the time had strict intervention responsabilities to the people (left behind, in fact), not the oil wells supply or artificially generated, as a result of previous neglect, recession concerns.
No, we aren't. It simply states that H _Bush contributed to setup the *second* NAFTA deal between Canada/USA/Mexico and that such a process doesn't necessarily caused a USA (only, btw) recession conditions partially or not; for that, you'd need a Gulf War and Koweit restarting Oil supply after fixing some sabotaged wells for steady production.
Check that file header and verify for some typos since Race 0 to 12 *Must* have a homeworld to be correctly handled in sandbox mode.
Even paparazzis can't put up with Fences if un&installed incorrectly. [e digicons]:troll:[/e] [e digicons]o_O[/e]
[quote]1994, I think.[/quote] Well, Clinton & Chrétien signed it... but negotiations were basicly finalized when Bush & Mulroney were in power.
[quote]That is certainly late 24th century design, and certainly post-Voyager.[/quote] VOY:4x26; Hope & Fear episode, quantum slipstream drive. Not as polyvalent or advanced (and, technologically functional!) as the Relativity though.
[quote]...it belongs to the collective.[/quote] And, since when Capitalism isn't collectively managed.
[quote]Wasn't that passed by Clinton 8 years before George W. Bush became president?[/quote] 1992, father or son?
[quote]How is the war against terror an economic policy?[/quote] Pweeezzze, DO click on earlier linked demonstrations & evidence of the total ongoing cost(s).
[quote]What does it have to do with time?[/quote] The world, you, me has changed radically since.
[quote who="Aroddo" reply="464" id="2353358"]NAFTA...[/quote] Reagan/Mulroney(88) & Bush/Mulroney/Salinas(92)... Effects , you meant.
[quote]So does slavery.[/quote] Yup, Egypt built the Pyramids and splendidly luxurious castles popped up like mushrooms in Europe during the Dark & Middle Ages. What time is it on your wrist watch? [e digicons]:annoyed:[/e]
[quote who="Aroddo" reply="454" id="2353179"]Anyway, regarding the health care reform, money isn't really the issue. The reform should - and that's something anyone can agree with - make health care more cost efficient and better, no matter which form it takes. But instead of discussing it earnestly, political games are played, lies are spoken, rational arguments screamed down. Financed by private insurers.[/quote] Excellent summary of the "situations". L
[quote who="willistuder" reply="470" id="2353409"]A lot of rich people are rich because they are productive, and provide employment for the rest of the populace. Socialists don't produce wealth, they steal it; they run out of other peoples money sooner or later.[/quote] Duh -- since when socialism doesn't employ people to generate wealth also.
[quote who="psychoak" reply="448" id="2353100"]They could march right into their neighbors and there's a damn good chance we wouldn't even interfere....[/quote] Such as; India, Japan, Russia or Taiwan? Four of which have better interests to (i dunno, somehow) keep watch rather than interfere when called for. Diplomatically yours or implicitly theirs makes central Asia as much of a bottleneck as Tibet staring up at the Himalayas. No wonder Indonesia and the Phillipines
[quote who="HG_Eliminator" reply="442" id="2353043"]the government can only print as much as it destroys... other wise the market would be flooded and the value of the dollar would drop dramatically.[/quote] The reasoning behind sustainable growth is that you need productivity & infra-structures; artificial influx by dropping values of both cannot be "compensated" by any coincidental market conditions (be it offered or enforced, btw). That's where some estimated Trading pacts were
[quote who="WIllythemailboy" reply="434" id="2352617"]...The second was in Canada, where presumably approach #1 was illegal. There they set all employees to minimum wage, with no chance of raises, ever.[/quote] The labor laws in Québec are, how to put it "gently", more obvious & less restrictive on BOTH the employers and any potential workforces. UFCW gave me & plenty of o