heh. . . I wonder if he'll be pissed about bandwidth usage. . . Oh well.
hegramet
I dount I should post a website here, but it has some excellent tiles. My brother made each and every one. I doubt this post will be appreciated. . . O well, maybe someone will find it useful. here's the link: http://www.novalis.org/brotherhood/volume-1.frames.html
I'm just guessing, but you decompose? -or- you get mailed to someone the person who found your corpse didn't like
everyone's doin their personal best to show that conversations here are more adult, i can tell
who called stardock evil? I missed it. can you point me to the comment which says that? and to critisize does not mean to not enjoy something. . . It is a form of participation even. And yes, as I've said, I do appreciate this site and its contributions to the community.
Where do you get the idea of jealousy from???? And this psuedonymn is not an anagram, it is a litereary reference. Did I say it was something other than a website? Also, "evil" is Brad's word, not mine, I haven't used it once. Don't put words in my mouth, read what I actually posted.
Actually, I'm Paxx's spoof.
If I were to lose my wallet I'd disappear. . . all my ID is in there, birth certificate and SS card. . . maybe I should get a box at the bank, whatdya think
I agree to disagree. And I never said they didn't have the right to make any changes or none at all, in fact I explicitly state that several times. And I am calm, I like the site and am staying, I merely disagree that this site, in its current form, does not present an image of the community I am part of favorably.
stop being a sycophant, frank. Am I wrong? if I am, tell me why and how, but don't tell me to get a life. . . You don't know me outside this thread. Either respond intelligently instead of with jibes, or don't post.
Why is it silly? Spoofing is fine as long as the anonymity isn't abused. And it isn't. . . there aren't mass flamewars between spoofers, the tomcruise fellow wasn't flaming, I read his post. . .his statement, though a bit inflamitory, was accurate and polite.
Because at this point there is no real alternative to this site, the others lack ease of use and a good sized skin library. Even if I bitch, I still really like this site, and visit it daily.
The reason behind the lack of honesty is kinda cloudy. . . .This claims to be a site for the general skinning, but should claim, as is the truth, that they host stadock products, and if they have money for bandwidth (if that is the reason; many have mentioned that we wouldn't want to put any stardock employees out on the street by, gasp, embracing competition) they will host some other skins aswell. It's merely a request that the stardock folks not pretend to serve two masters.
I think that one reason there is a lot of discord over how the site is put together is because, as skinners, we tend to want things customized exactly. . .just a thought.
I still have no answer concerning the mission statement . . . so call me elitist (which is stupid and false) or whatever you like, but there's still a lack of honesty.
why do you not blame them? and I won't upload here, I don't like their policies concerning their rights with my work. It's not a matter of them caring because I represent a large or small number of people, they should at least think about it, or tell me why they shouldn't think about it, or tell me why I shouldn't ask that question. They should do this because I am a member of the skinning community, and as a fellow member, they should explain why they act in ways that effect the community ad
If you have to worry about getting a real username with skins attached exiled by vindictive admins for saying something they don't like, I'd say they are the ones with no balls. . . not that this has happened, but a fake user is insurance concerning that.
Sure. . . Tandis, you should not put me down before you actually read what I say: "I'm not saying that he has no right to make it a company site, but he should be honest that though there is a community of people who use company's software here, this is not the skinning community itself." -hegramet [[Translation]] WindowBlinds skinners are not part of the skinning community. Uhh right. By this I mean, and I feel this to be fairly clear, that this site does not sol
..to an Apprentice. To become an apprentice one needs to be contributing to the skinning community in some way. WinCustomize is not the skinning community, helping other websites in the skinning community counts as well. An apprentice can.. Smartass. . . what, you didn't think I read the whole thing? No, this site isn't the skinning community, but it is part of it. Though making any argument one way or the other from this poorly written passage is useless. . . feel free to try.
Hey, I didn't demonize personal profit, I merely said you were dishonest. Paxx - that would be a community, but McDonalds wouldn't be a part of it.
except that you run it for personal profit behind a veneer of community, instead of having more respect for the community than to see it merely as a pool of customers.
I've been away from the tread for the evening, and read through it. I don't see one thing tho. . . the reason for not changing the mission statement to be accurate. I really don't care about changing anything else, I just want an answer to this question: Why is the mission statement not accurate? And please do not say I should make my own site. . .I am a member of the skinning communtiy, and since you run a community site you could at least acknoledge my requests as valid even if you choose
It is a component of Object Desktop, by stardock, and you have to register OD to get object bar as well as a bunch of other great and good value programs. It doesn't come one its own yet, as it is still in beta.
And china, plz, stay on topic. This is a fairly serious issue.
it's not a democracy. . .no shit!! Could it be? Not if it's owned by stardock as opposed to being ostensibly a skinning community. How could variety and competition be bad for anyone but stardock in this case. . .Are they acting in your best interests by not allowing it? NO! So don't defend them or their decisions; you don't get paid to. . .they do. . .I would like to hear from Brad on this topic. And so you know my position, I would like to have this not be a stardock controlled site, but